83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8770477)
1. Variability in estimation of coronary dimensions from 6F and 8F catheters.
Legrand V; Raskinet B; Martinez C; Kulbertus H
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):39-45; discussion 46. PubMed ID: 8770477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of catheter size on reliability of quantitative coronary angiographic measurements (comparison of 4Fr and 6Fr catheters).
Ito S; Kinoshita K; Endo A; Nakamura M; Muramatsu T
Heart Vessels; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1752-1757. PubMed ID: 26849831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of 4 French catheters for quantitative coronary analysis: in vivo variability assessment using 6 French guiding catheters as reference scaling devices.
Sanmartin M; Goicolea J; Castellanos R; Bravo M; Ocaranza R; Cuevas D; Mantilla R; Ruiz-Salmeron R
J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 16(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 15152158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative coronary arteriography using 6 and 8 French catheters with cine angiographic acquisition.
Ellis SG; Pinto IM; McGillem MJ; DeBoe SF; LeFree MT; Mancini GB
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Jan; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 1995176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical experience with the ACS RX Lifestream coronary dilatation catheter: a new low profile perfusion balloon catheter.
Saito T; Yashita S; Noda K; Mizuno Y; Kawabata S; Higa T; Nakahashi E; Iwasa A; Nishiyama K; Ohshima S
J Invasive Cardiol; 1995; 7 Suppl B():39B-45B; discussion 50B-56B. PubMed ID: 10155122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pitfalls in the determination of absolute dimensions using angiographic catheters as calibration devices in quantitative angiography.
Fortin DF; Spero LA; Cusma JT; Santoro L; Burgess R; Bashore TM
Am J Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 68(11):1176-82. PubMed ID: 1951077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach.
Keane D; Haase J; Slager CJ; Montauban van Swijndregt E; Lehmann KG; Ozaki Y; di Mario C; Kirkeeide R; Serruys PW
Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(8):2174-83. PubMed ID: 7697846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography.
Herrington DM; Siebes M; Sokol DK; Siu CO; Walford GD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 22(4):1068-74. PubMed ID: 8409042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 6F with 7F and 8F guiding catheters for elective coronary angioplasty: results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.
Metz D; Meyer P; Touati C; Coste P; Petiteau PY; Durand P; Faivre R; Lefevre T; Elaerts J
Am Heart J; 1997 Jul; 134(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 9266794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lesion length assessment using a new vessel caliper.
Wolyn R; Dixon SR; Almany SL; Korotko J; Huang RR; O'Neill WW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Feb; 58(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 12552538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized trial comparing the benefits and limitations of 6Fr and 8Fr guiding catheters in elective coronary angioplasty: clinical, procedural, angiographic, and economic end points.
Talley JD; Mauldin PD; Becker ER
J Interv Cardiol; 1995 Aug; 8(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 10155247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of measurements of coronary narrowings by videodensitometry and by digital calipers.
Balkin J; Rosenmann D; Ilan M; Zion MM
Cardiology; 1992; 81(4-5):238-44. PubMed ID: 1301249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 4 and 6 French catheters for coronary angiography: real-world modeling.
Durst R; Lotan C; Nassar H; Gotsman M; Mor E; Varshitzki B; Greganski P; Jabara R; Admon D; Meerkin D; Mosseri M
Isr Med Assoc J; 2007 Apr; 9(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 17491224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increased risk of coronary artery dissection during coronary angiography with 6F catheters.
Prewitt KC; Zen B; Wortham DC; Pearson C
Angiology; 1993 Feb; 44(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 8434803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of quantitative computerized and human panel coronary endpoint measures: implications for the design of angiographic trials.
Mack WJ; Azen SP; Dunn M; Hodis HN
Control Clin Trials; 1997 Apr; 18(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 9129860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limitations in the use of five French coronary catheters.
Brown EF; Hartnell GG; Morris K; Wilde P
Int J Card Imaging; 1991; 7(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 1753158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty through 6F diagnostic catheters: a feasibility study.
Resar JR; Prewitt KC; Wolff MR; Blumenthal R; Raqueno JV; Brinker JA
Am Heart J; 1993 Jun; 125(6):1591-6. PubMed ID: 8498298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advances in two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: improved small lumen diameter detection and automatic reference vessel diameter derivation.
Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Onuma Y; Aben JP; Weijers B; Morel MA; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
EuroIntervention; 2012 Mar; 7(11):1326-35. PubMed ID: 22433196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of quantitative coronary analysis, Assessment of variability due to frame selection, different observers, and different cinefilmless laboratories.
Sirnes PA; Myreng Y; Mølstad P; Golf S
Int J Card Imaging; 1996 Sep; 12(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 8915721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and precision of quantitative arteriography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease after coronary bypass surgery. A validation study.
Syvänne M; Nieminen MS; Frick MH
Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Dec; 10(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 7722345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
