These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8771030)
1. Artifacts and signal loss due to flow in the presence of B(o) inhomogeneity. Drangova M; Pelc NJ Magn Reson Med; 1996 Jan; 35(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 8771030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of phantom and computer-simulated MR images of flow in a convergent geometry: implications for improved two-dimensional MR angiography. Siegel JM; Oshinski JN; Pettigrew RI; Ku DN J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 8748485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetization transfer on in vitro circulating blood: implications for time-of-flight MR angiography. Dousset V; Degrèze P; Mièze S; Sesay M; Basse-Cathalinat B; Caillé JM J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):786-8. PubMed ID: 8748505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pulsatile flow artifacts in two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography: initial studies in elastic models of human carotid arteries. Buxton RB; Kerber CW; Frank LR J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(4):625-36. PubMed ID: 8347956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study. Fürst G; Hofer M; Sitzer M; Kahn T; Müller E; Mödder U J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 7560312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with variable TE (VARIETE) for fat signal reduction. Lin W; Haacke EM; Tkach JA Magn Reson Med; 1994 Nov; 32(5):678-83. PubMed ID: 7808272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mapping of turbulent intensity by magnetic resonance imaging. Gatenby JC; Gore JC J Magn Reson B; 1994 Jun; 104(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 8049864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-echo acquisition of MR angiography and venography of the brain at 3 Tesla. Du YP; Jin Z; Hu Y; Tanabe J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Aug; 30(2):449-54. PubMed ID: 19629975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calculation of the magnetization distribution for fluid flow in curved vessels. Jou LD; van Tyen R; Berger SA; Saloner D Magn Reson Med; 1996 Apr; 35(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 8992209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 4D UTE flow: a phase-contrast MRI technique for assessment and visualization of stenotic flows. Kadbi M; Negahdar M; Cha JW; Traughber M; Martin P; Stoddard MF; Amini AA Magn Reson Med; 2015 Mar; 73(3):939-50. PubMed ID: 24604617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined analysis of spatial and velocity displacement artifacts in phase contrast measurements of complex flows. Steinman DA; Ethier CR; Rutt BK J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 9090588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of pressure gradients in pulsatile flow from magnetic resonance acceleration measurements. Tasu JP; Mousseaux E; Delouche A; Oddou C; Jolivet O; Bittoun J Magn Reson Med; 2000 Jul; 44(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 10893523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and precision of time-averaged flow as measured by nontriggered 2D phase-contrast MR angiography, a phantom evaluation. Bakker CJ; Kouwenhoven M; Hartkamp MJ; Hoogeveen RM; Mali WP Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 13(7):959-65. PubMed ID: 8583874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New ways of performing in vivo flow velocity measurements in the basilar artery. Ravensbergen J; Tarnawski M; Vriens EM; Hillen B; Caro CG; Van Huffelen AC Neuroradiology; 1996 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8773265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]