These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8771042)

  • 1. Sensitivity of femoral strain pattern analyses to resultant and muscle forces at the hip joint.
    Lengsfeld M; Kaminsky J; Merz B; Franke RP
    Med Eng Phys; 1996 Jan; 18(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 8771042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomical and biomechanical investigations of the iliotibial tract.
    Birnbaum K; Siebert CH; Pandorf T; Schopphoff E; Prescher A; Niethard FU
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Dec; 26(6):433-46. PubMed ID: 15378277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Automatic generation of 3-D finite element codes of the human femur].
    Lengsfeld M; Kaminsky J; Merz B; Franke RP
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1994 May; 39(5):117-22. PubMed ID: 8049341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An experimental method for the application of lateral muscle loading and its effect on femoral strain distributions.
    Szivek JA; Benjamin JB; Anderson PL
    Med Eng Phys; 2000 Mar; 22(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 10854964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A femoral model with all relevant muscles and hip capsule ligaments.
    Helwig P; Hindenlang U; Hirschmüller A; Konstantinidis L; Südkamp N; Schneider R
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16(6):669-77. PubMed ID: 22149414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Function-orientated structural analysis of the proximal human femur.
    Skuban TP; Vogel T; Baur-Melnyk A; Jansson V; Heimkes B
    Cells Tissues Organs; 2009; 190(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 19321950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of hip anatomical variations on the cartilage stress: a finite element analysis towards the biomechanical exploration of the factors that may explain primary hip arthritis in morphologically normal subjects.
    Sánchez Egea AJ; Valera M; Parraga Quiroga JM; Proubasta I; Noailly J; Lacroix D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2014 Apr; 29(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 24530154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of head constraint and muscle forces on the strain distribution within the intact femur.
    Simões JA; Vaz MA; Blatcher S; Taylor M
    Med Eng Phys; 2000 Sep; 22(7):453-9. PubMed ID: 11165142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship of neck orientation to the shape of the proximal femur.
    Clark JM; Freeman MA; Witham D
    J Arthroplasty; 1987; 2(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 3612146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Hip centralising forces of the iliotibial tract with various femoral neck angles].
    Birnbaum K; Pandorf T; Prescher A; Niethard FU; Weisskopf M
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 19551586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Age-related force distribution at the proximal end of the femur in normally growing children].
    Heimkes B; Posel P; Plitz W; Zimmer M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 9199067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model study of muscle forces and joint-force direction in normal and dysplastic neonatal hips.
    Spoor CW; van Leeuwen JL; de Windt FH; Huson A
    J Biomech; 1989; 22(8-9):873-84. PubMed ID: 2613723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femoral strain profiles under simulated 3-D muscle and joint loads for heel strike, midstance, and toe off.
    Latour RA; Brattain MA
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2000; 28(1-2):109-13. PubMed ID: 10999373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of loading parameters in the canine hip in vivo.
    Page AE; Allan C; Jasty M; Harrigan TP; Bragdon CR; Harris WH
    J Biomech; 1993; 26(4-5):571-9. PubMed ID: 8478358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical effect with respect to the sagittal positioning of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Park KK; Koh YG; Park KM; Park JH; Kang KT
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2019; 30(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 30741665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of hip center location on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles.
    Delp SL; Maloney W
    J Biomech; 1993; 26(4-5):485-99. PubMed ID: 8478351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Influence of Different Abduction Angles of Hip Joint on Stress Distribution of Femoral Neck].
    Zhang H; Song C; Zhao W; Yin A; Zhu J; Ren G
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 33(2):274-8. PubMed ID: 29708660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Normal hip joint contact pressure distribution in single-leg standing--effect of gender and anatomic parameters.
    Genda E; Iwasaki N; Li G; MacWilliams BA; Barrance PJ; Chao EY
    J Biomech; 2001 Jul; 34(7):895-905. PubMed ID: 11410173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Mechanical loading of the human femoral neck].
    Hert J; Fiala P; Jírová J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):222-9. PubMed ID: 11706546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stress and strain distribution in the intact canine femur: finite element analysis.
    Shahar R; Banks-Sills L; Eliasy R
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Jun; 25(5):387-95. PubMed ID: 12711236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.