140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8771292)
1. The prognostic significance of the ball-valve effect in Groshong catheters.
Tolar B; Gould JR
Support Care Cancer; 1996 Jan; 4(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 8771292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The timing and sequence of multiple device-related complications in patients with long-term indwelling Groshong catheters.
Tolar B; Gould JR
Cancer; 1996 Sep; 78(6):1308-13. PubMed ID: 8826955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Groshong catheter-associated subclavian venous thrombosis.
Gould JR; Carloss HW; Skinner WL
Am J Med; 1993 Oct; 95(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 8213875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.
Biffi R; Corrado F; de Braud F; de Lucia F; Scarpa D; Testori A; Orsi F; Bellomi M; Mauri S; Aapro M; Andreoni B
Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1190-4. PubMed ID: 9301441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Externalized Groshong catheters and Hickman ports for central venous access in gynecologic oncology patients.
Gleeson NC; Fiorica JV; Mark JE; Pinelli DM; Hoffman MS; Roberts WS; Cavanagh D
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Dec; 51(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 8112648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Groshong versus Hickman catheters.
Pasquale MD; Campbell JM; Magnant CM
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 May; 174(5):408-10. PubMed ID: 1570619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized, prospective trial of standard Hickman compared with Groshong central venous catheters in pediatric oncology patients.
Warner BW; Haygood MM; Davies SL; Hennies GA
J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Aug; 183(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 8696545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized, prospective trial of central venous ports connected to standard open-ended or Groshong catheters in adult oncology patients.
Biffi R; De Braud F; Orsi F; Pozzi S; Arnaldi P; Goldhirsch A; Rotmensz N; Robertson C; Bellomi M; Andreoni B
Cancer; 2001 Sep; 92(5):1204-12. PubMed ID: 11571734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longterm central venous access in gynecologic cancer patients.
Minassian VA; Sood AK; Lowe P; Sorosky JI; Al-Jurf AS; Buller RE
J Am Coll Surg; 2000 Oct; 191(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 11030246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.
Taxbro K; Hammarskjöld F; Thelin B; Lewin F; Hagman H; Hanberger H; Berg S
Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jun; 122(6):734-741. PubMed ID: 31005243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two types of catheters through femoral vein catheterization in patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A retrospective study.
Xu B; Zhang J; Tang S; Hou J; Ma M
J Vasc Access; 2018 Nov; 19(6):651-657. PubMed ID: 29701120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications with fully implantable venous access systems in oncologic patients.
Laurenzi L; Fimiani C; Faglieri N; Natoli S; Milasi G; Tirelli W; Arcuri E
Tumori; 1996; 82(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 8693600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insertion of Groshong central venous catheters utilizing fluoroscopic techniques.
Burnett AF; Lossef SV; Barth KH; Grendys EC; Johnson JC; Barter JF; Barnes WA
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 8307504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparisons of outcomes and survivals for two central venous access port systems.
Hou SM; Wang PC; Sung YC; Lee HH; Liu HT; Chen YH
J Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 91(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 15999349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Central venous thrombosis: an early and frequent complication in cancer patients bearing long-term silastic catheter. A prospective study.
De Cicco M; Matovic M; Balestreri L; Panarello G; Fantin D; Morassut S; Testa V
Thromb Res; 1997 Apr; 86(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 9175232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients: a prospective study of over 50,000 catheter days.
Kang J; Chen W; Sun W; Ge R; Li H; Ma E; Su Q; Cheng F; Hong J; Zhang Y; Lei C; Wang X; Jin A; Liu W
J Vasc Access; 2017 Mar; 18(2):153-157. PubMed ID: 28218366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective randomized comparative evaluation of proximal valve polyurethane and distal valve silicone peripherally inserted central catheters.
Ong CK; Venkatesh SK; Lau GB; Wang SC
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1191-6. PubMed ID: 20598573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Complications related to permanent deep venous catheterization using dual lumen hemodialysis catheter].
Zhang P; Yuan J; Chen JH; Wu JY; Zhang XH; Jiang H
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 43(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 15059375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Infectious and non-infectious complications of tunneled central catheters in hematologic patients].
Albo López C; López Rodríguez D; Constenla Camba MI; Jimenéz Blanco A; Araujo LF; García-Medina J
Sangre (Barc); 1999 Jun; 44(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10481577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Groshong or implanted catheter infections in ambulatory haematological patients.
Girard R; Traullé C; DeSantis N; Espinouse D; Gardes S; Coiffier B
J Infect Public Health; 2010; 3(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 20869675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
