355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8774645)
1. Peripheral infusion ports for central venous access in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Cunningham MJ; Collins MB; Kredentser DC; Malfetano JH
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Mar; 60(3):397-9. PubMed ID: 8774645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term experience with a totally implanted catheter system in gynecologic oncologic patients.
Koonings PP; Given FT
J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 8173727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experience with the intravenous totally implanted port in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Nelson BE; Mayer AR; Tseng PC; Schwartz PE
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Apr; 53(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 8175028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence of mechanical malfunction in low-profile subcutaneous implantable venous access devices in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Kimball KJ; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Estes JM; Alvarez RD
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Oct; 123(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21742372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A peripherally implanted permanent central venous access device.
Morris P; Buller R; Kendall S; Anderson B
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 78(6):1138-42. PubMed ID: 1945224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Externalized Groshong catheters and Hickman ports for central venous access in gynecologic oncology patients.
Gleeson NC; Fiorica JV; Mark JE; Pinelli DM; Hoffman MS; Roberts WS; Cavanagh D
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Dec; 51(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 8112648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complications related to indwelling caval catheters on a gynecologic oncology service.
Silver DF; Hempling RE; Recio FO; Piver MS; Eltabbakh GH
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Sep; 70(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 9790783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: central venous catheters (access, care, diagnosis and therapy of complications).
Pittiruti M; Hamilton H; Biffi R; MacFie J; Pertkiewicz M;
Clin Nutr; 2009 Aug; 28(4):365-77. PubMed ID: 19464090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Insertion of Groshong central venous catheters utilizing fluoroscopic techniques.
Burnett AF; Lossef SV; Barth KH; Grendys EC; Johnson JC; Barter JF; Barnes WA
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 8307504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peripheral ports are a new option for central venous access.
Schuman E; Ragsdale J
J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Apr; 180(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 7719550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The complications of central venous access systems: a study of 218 patients.
Torramadé JR; Cienfuegos JA; Hernández JL; Pardo F; Benito C; González J; Balén E; de Villa V
Eur J Surg; 1993; 159(6-7):323-7. PubMed ID: 8104491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The fate of 100 prolonged venous access devices.
Hayward SR; Ledgerwood AM; Lucas CE
Am Surg; 1990 Sep; 56(9):515-9. PubMed ID: 2393188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do central venous catheters have advantages over arteriovenous fistulas or grafts?
Quarello F; Forneris G; Borca M; Pozzato M
J Nephrol; 2006; 19(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 16874685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer.
Beckers MM; Ruven HJ; Seldenrijk CA; Prins MH; Biesma DH
Thromb Res; 2010 Apr; 125(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 19640573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis.
Schwarz RE; Groeger JS; Coit DG
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 79(8):1635-40. PubMed ID: 9118051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advances in venous access devices and nursing management strategies.
Wickham RS
Nurs Clin North Am; 1990 Jun; 25(2):345-64. PubMed ID: 2110664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of Groshong central venous catheters on a gynecologic oncology service.
Holloway RW; Orr JW
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Feb; 56(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 7896188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of venous access device wound complications in patients undergoing paclitaxel chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
Boulay RM; Olt GJ; Podczaski ES
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Aug; 70(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 9740701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
