These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8777590)

  • 1. An audit of film reject and repeat rates in a department of dental radiology.
    Nixon PP; Thorogood J; Holloway J; Smith NJ
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Dec; 68(816):1304-7. PubMed ID: 8777590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital radiography reject analysis of examinations with multiple rejects: an Australian emergency imaging department clinical audit.
    Stephenson-Smith B; Neep MJ; Rowntree P
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 68(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 33826800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reject analysis in direct digital radiography.
    Andersen ER; Jorde J; Taoussi N; Yaqoob SH; Konst B; Seierstad T
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Mar; 53(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 22287147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuing reject-repeat film analysis program.
    Gadeholt G; Geitung JT; Göthlin JH; Asp T
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 2509204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reject rate analysis in digital radiography: an Australian emergency imaging department case study.
    Atkinson S; Neep M; Starkey D
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Mar; 67(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 31318181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation.
    Nol J; Isouard G; Mirecki J
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16421768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of reject x-ray films as a quality assurance element in diagnostic radiology].
    Lewentat G; Bohndorf K
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 9198508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of dental radiography in the Czech Republic--results of a TLD and film postal audit.
    Novák L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):155-8. PubMed ID: 16782748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of film reject rate in the diagnostic x-ray facility of a tertiary health institution in Benin, Nigeria.
    Eze CU; Olajide BO; Ohagwu CC; Abonyi LC
    Nig Q J Hosp Med; 2013; 23(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 24579496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis and Economic Implication of X-Ray Film Reject in Diagnostic Radiology Department of Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia.
    Zewdu M; Kadir E; Berhane M
    Ethiop J Health Sci; 2017 Jul; 27(4):421-426. PubMed ID: 29217944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective and subjective analysis of the image quality of two E-speed dental X-ray films.
    Kaffe I
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 May; 19(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 2079140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeat film analysis and its implications for quality assurance in dental radiology: An institutional case study.
    Acharya S; Pai KM; Acharya S
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(3):392-5. PubMed ID: 26321841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitometric properties of direct exposure dental X-ray films in relation to the characteristic curve.
    Boere G; van Aken J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 May; 19(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 2079139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of undergraduate teaching of the identification of radiographic film faults.
    Rushton VE; Hirschmann PN; Bearn DR
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Nov; 34(6):337-42. PubMed ID: 16227475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of an image quality assurance program.
    Göthlin JH; Alders B
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 4029161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Assessing the stability of parameters of equipment for dental radiography].
    Chikirdin EG; Zakharova VI
    Med Tekh; 1997; (5):3-4. PubMed ID: 9445977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Classification and standards criteria for film holders in retro-alveolar radiography].
    Deverin JM
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1986; 15(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 3460149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quality of dental x-ray pictures from Swiss dental practice].
    Zappa U; Graf H
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1982 Nov; 92(11):1033-40. PubMed ID: 6960475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing E- and D-speed film: the effects of various storage conditions on fogging.
    Nesbit S; Platin E; Phillips C; Matteson S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Feb; 126(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 7860889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.