These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8778134)

  • 1. Procedural debiasing of primacy/anchoring effects in clinical-like judgments.
    Mumma GH; Wilson SB
    J Clin Psychol; 1995 Nov; 51(6):841-53. PubMed ID: 8778134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anchoring errors in clinical-like judgments.
    Richards MS; Wierzbicki M
    J Clin Psychol; 1990 May; 46(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 2347942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A general model of cognitive bias in human judgment and systematic review specific to forensic mental health.
    Neal TMS; Lienert P; Denne E; Singh JP
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):99-120. PubMed ID: 35191729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
    Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response speeding mediates the contributions of cue familiarity and target retrievability to metamnemonic judgments.
    Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Oct; 12(5):874-9. PubMed ID: 16524004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values.
    Chapman GB; Johnson EJ
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Aug; 79(2):115-153. PubMed ID: 10433900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anchoring and publicity effects in clinical judgment.
    Friedlander ML; Stockman SJ
    J Clin Psychol; 1983 Jul; 39(4):637-43. PubMed ID: 6875008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An analysis-of-variance model for the assessment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment.
    Hoffman PJ; Slovic P; Rorer LG
    Psychol Bull; 1968 May; 69(5):338-49. PubMed ID: 5659659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective Importance as a Cue for Self-Reference.
    Culcea IC; Freitas AL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1100-1111. PubMed ID: 28903717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual and Cognitive Judgments Show Both Anchoring and Repulsion.
    Spicer J; Zhu JQ; Chater N; Sanborn AN
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Sep; 33(9):1395-1407. PubMed ID: 35876741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anchoring and Judgment Bias: Disregarding Under Uncertainty.
    Berg SA; Moss JH
    Psychol Rep; 2022 Oct; 125(5):2688-2708. PubMed ID: 34039105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of social judgments of creativity and intelligence.
    Rossman BB; Gollob HF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1975 Feb; 31(2):271-81. PubMed ID: 1123714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive changes between cue abstraction and exemplar memory in a multiple-cue judgment task with continuous cues.
    Karlsson L; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Dec; 14(6):1140-6. PubMed ID: 18229487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Taking the high (or low) road: a quantifier priming perspective on basic anchoring effects.
    Sleeth-Keppler D
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(4):424-47. PubMed ID: 23951950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Debiasing Health-Related Judgments and Decision Making: A Systematic Review.
    Ludolph R; Schulz PJ
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Jan; 38(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 28649904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cue parameters, cue probabilities, and clinical judgment.
    Dana RH; Cocking RR
    J Clin Psychol; 1968 Oct; 24(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 5735107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise Increases Anchoring Effects.
    Lee CY; Morewedge CK
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Jan; 33(1):60-75. PubMed ID: 34878951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When "bad" is good: How evaluative judgments eliminate the standard anchoring effect.
    Schweickart O; Tam C; Brown NR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 75(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32597668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do Researchers Anchor Their Beliefs on the Outcome of an Initial Study?
    Ernst AF; Hoekstra R; Wagenmakers EJ; Gelman A; van Ravenzwaaij D
    Exp Psychol; 2018 May; 65(3):158-169. PubMed ID: 29905114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: A meta-analysis.
    Bystranowski P; Janik B; Próchnicki M; Skórska P
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 33734746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.