These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A general model of cognitive bias in human judgment and systematic review specific to forensic mental health. Neal TMS; Lienert P; Denne E; Singh JP Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):99-120. PubMed ID: 35191729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect. Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response speeding mediates the contributions of cue familiarity and target retrievability to metamnemonic judgments. Benjamin AS Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Oct; 12(5):874-9. PubMed ID: 16524004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values. Chapman GB; Johnson EJ Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Aug; 79(2):115-153. PubMed ID: 10433900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An analysis-of-variance model for the assessment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment. Hoffman PJ; Slovic P; Rorer LG Psychol Bull; 1968 May; 69(5):338-49. PubMed ID: 5659659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Subjective Importance as a Cue for Self-Reference. Culcea IC; Freitas AL Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1100-1111. PubMed ID: 28903717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual and Cognitive Judgments Show Both Anchoring and Repulsion. Spicer J; Zhu JQ; Chater N; Sanborn AN Psychol Sci; 2022 Sep; 33(9):1395-1407. PubMed ID: 35876741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When "bad" is good: How evaluative judgments eliminate the standard anchoring effect. Schweickart O; Tam C; Brown NR Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 75(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32597668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do Researchers Anchor Their Beliefs on the Outcome of an Initial Study? Ernst AF; Hoekstra R; Wagenmakers EJ; Gelman A; van Ravenzwaaij D Exp Psychol; 2018 May; 65(3):158-169. PubMed ID: 29905114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: A meta-analysis. Bystranowski P; Janik B; Próchnicki M; Skórska P Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 33734746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]