These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8778378)

  • 1. Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 8778378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The bond strength of elastomer tray adhesives to thermoplastic and acrylic resin tray materials.
    Hogans WR; Agar JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):541-3. PubMed ID: 1507140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
    Thompson GA; Vermilyea SG; Agar JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesion of elastomeric impression materials to trays.
    Bindra B; Heath JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9049922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of tray material and surface condition on the shear bond strength of impression materials.
    Wang RR; Nguyen T; Boyle AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8809248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of tray adhesives for the adhesion of elastomer rubber impression materials to impression modeling plastics for border molding.
    Nishigawa G; Sato T; Suenaga K; Minagi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 9513098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The bonding properties of various silicone impression materials at standardized surfaces using adhesives].
    Morneburg T
    Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991; 41(8):306-8. PubMed ID: 1816858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Brown JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8003192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Properties of the tray adhesive of an addition polymerizing silicone to impression tray materials.
    Sulong MZ; Setchell DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec; 66(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 1805022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials.
    Smith SJ; McCord JF; Macfarlane TV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 12447220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.
    Peregrina A; Land MF; Wandling C; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peel bond strength between 3D printing tray materials and elastomeric impression/adhesive systems: A laboratory study.
    Xu Y; Huettig F; Schille C; Schweizer E; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Spintzyk S
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):e241-e254. PubMed ID: 32456949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tensile bond strength between custom tray and elastomeric impression material.
    Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Oka M; Minagi S; Irie M; Suzuki K
    Dent Mater J; 2007 May; 26(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 17694739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.