These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8778378)

  • 61. The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: a pilot study.
    Larson TD; Nielsen MA; Brackett WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):625-7. PubMed ID: 12131884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Vertical distortion in distal extension ridges and palatal area of casts made by different techniques.
    Wang HY; Lu YC; Shiau YY; Tsou D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 75(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 8648579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of tissue conditioning materials.
    Pissiotis A; Panagiotouni E; Sofou A; Diakoyanni I; Kaloyannides A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Dec; 3(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 8605503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Use of Pindex system in fabrication of the sectional custom tray.
    Jabbari E; Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):417-9. PubMed ID: 24417537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. An alternative method for direct custom tray construction using a visible light-cured resin.
    Castellani D; Basile M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jul; 78(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 9237149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone.
    Haddad MF; Goiato MC; Santos DM; Crepaldi Nde M; Pesqueira AA; Bannwart LC
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 23329247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Abrasion resistance of a resin-impregnated type IV gypsum in comparison to conventional products.
    Lindquist TJ; Stanford CM; Mostafavi H; Xie XJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Mar; 87(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 11941359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
    Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Evaluation of polycaprolaitone custom tray material.
    Pilcher ES; Draughn RA
    J Prosthodont; 1993 Sep; 2(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 8298721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners.
    Kulak-Ozkan Y; Sertgoz A; Gedik H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 12644808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part I: Condensation silicones.
    Lacy AM; Bellman T; Fukui H; Jendresen MD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Feb; 45(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 7009840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays.
    Bomberg TJ; Hatch RA; Hoffman W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Aug; 54(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 3903109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers to an acrylic substrate.
    Hatamleh MM; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 20122716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.