301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8778408)
1. Avoiding conization for inadequate colposcopy. Suggestions for conservative therapy.
Yandell RB; Hannigan EV; Dinh TV; Buchanan VS
J Reprod Med; 1996 Mar; 41(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 8778408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of High-Grade Histopathology Diagnosed by Cervical Conization in Endocervical Curettage Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1: A Case-Control Study.
Cong Q; Xiao J; Tao X; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jul; 24(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 32324695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The pre- and postoperative value of endocervical curettage in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer.
Fine BA; Feinstein GI; Sabella V
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Oct; 71(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 9784317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endocervical curettage: does it contribute to the management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology?
Oyer R; Hanjani P
Gynecol Oncol; 1986 Oct; 25(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 3758830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should unsatisfactory colposcopy necessitate treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1?
Day T; Weitzen S; Cooper AS; Boardman LA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Jan; 12(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 18162806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contribution of endocervical curettage in evaluating abnormal cervical cytology.
Drescher CW; Peters WA; Roberts JA
Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 6877690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary?
McCord ML; Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Ling FW
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 2014085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy.
Ramirez EJ; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 2352226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic significance and sequelae of cone biopsy.
Holdt DG; Jacobs AJ; Scott JC; Adam GM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jun; 143(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 7081348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endocervical curettage as a routine part of colposcopic examinations for abnormal cervical cytology.
Saltzman DH; Evans MI; Warsof SL; Friedman AJ
J Reprod Med; 1985 Nov; 30(11):871-3. PubMed ID: 4078822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure or Cervical Conization to Exclude Cervical Cancer Before Simple Hysterectomy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Peterson P
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Apr; 24(2):202-205. PubMed ID: 32243315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
Hunter V; Tseng P
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Negative cone biopsies. A reappraisal.
Diakomanolis E; Haidopoulos D; Chatzipapas I; Rodolakis A; Stefanidis K; Markaki S
J Reprod Med; 2003 Aug; 48(8):617-21. PubMed ID: 12971142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
