These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8778457)

  • 1. Prolonging life and allowing death: infants.
    Campbell AG; McHaffie HE
    J Med Ethics; 1995 Dec; 21(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 8778457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective.
    Ackerman JW; Pope MC
    J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ethics of withholding and withdrawing critical care.
    Sanders LM; Raffin TA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 8293207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Severely disabled newborns: to live or let die?
    Jackson CC
    J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):135-76. PubMed ID: 11644153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
    Cooper R
    Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neonatal ethical dilemmas examined.
    Brodeur D
    Issues (St Louis Mo); 1994; 9(6):1-5, 8. PubMed ID: 11652838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants.
    Smith SR
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases?
    Paris JJ; Ferranti J; Reardon F
    J Clin Ethics; 2001; 12(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 11789063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards guidelines for withholding and withdrawal of life prolonging treatment in neonatal medicine.
    Doyal L; Wilsher D
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 1994 Jan; 70(1):F66-70. PubMed ID: 8117133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Premature infants: a legal approach to decision-making in neonatal intensive care.
    Gorski SL
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1985; 19(3-4):261-81. PubMed ID: 11649774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High risk infants: thirty years of intensive care.
    Harris CH
    Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11653275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
    Ciulla JB
    Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role responsibilities in clinical bioethics: the dialectic of consultation -- comments on the case presented by Barbara Springer Edwards.
    Dagi TF
    J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 11642823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. International symposium on critically ill newborns. An overview and introduction.
    Blank RH
    J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 7636401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
    Riga PJ
    Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis.
    Crossley MA
    Med Law; 1987; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
    Barry RL
    Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The extremely low birthweight infant: ethical issues in treatment.
    Yu VY
    Aust Paediatr J; 1987 Apr; 23(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 2441691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Withholding life-sustaining treatment from severely defective newborns: who should decide?
    Greenstein LJ
    Med Law; 1987; 6(6):487-97. PubMed ID: 3312908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suggests local ethics committees to advise on very LBW.
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Aug 1-14; 18(15):10. PubMed ID: 11653454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.