These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8778818)

  • 1. Recent developments in breast imaging.
    Säbel M; Aichinger H
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Mar; 41(3):315-68. PubMed ID: 8778818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of early breast cancer: an overview and future prospects.
    Zhou XH; Gordon R
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(3):203-55. PubMed ID: 2673660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast imaging.
    Kopans DB; Meyer JE; Sadowsky N
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Apr; 310(15):960-7. PubMed ID: 6366562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.
    Chen B; Ning R
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):755-70. PubMed ID: 12033572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Smith AP; Hall PA; Marcello DM
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 15377106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonmammographic breast imaging techniques. Current status and future developments.
    Kopans DB
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 14(3):651-65. PubMed ID: 3323969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [New trends and novel possibilities in the diagnostic imaging of breast cancer].
    Bidlek M; Kovács E; Fehér K; Gõdény M
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Mar; 59(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25763913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems: first experiences within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.
    Thierens H; Bosmans H; Buls N; Bacher K; De Hauwere A; Jacobs J; Clerinx P
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 17696080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
    Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current challenges of full field digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H; Van Steen A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):148-53. PubMed ID: 16461520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential.
    Adler DD; Wahl RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 7998538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast imaging: a view from the present to the future.
    Sickles EA
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):118-25. PubMed ID: 3896613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I.
    Bloomquist AK; Yaffe MJ; Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Mawdsley GE; Bright S; Shen SZ; Mahesh M; Nickoloff EL; Fleischman RC; Williams MB; Maidment AD; Beideck DJ; Och J; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):719-36. PubMed ID: 16878575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tests for breast cancer. Mammography is going digital. But is it better than film?
    Harv Health Lett; 2007 May; 32(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 17575613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolving role of new imaging methods in breast screening.
    Houssami N; Ciatto S
    Prev Med; 2011 Sep; 53(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 21605590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
    Van Ongeval Ch
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast CT.
    Glick SJ
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2007; 9():501-26. PubMed ID: 17506654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design and evaluation of an external filter technique for exposure equalization in mammography.
    Keshavmurthy SP; Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Christodoulou E
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1655-69. PubMed ID: 10501065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial.
    Yaffe MJ; Bloomquist AK; Mawdsley GE; Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Fajardo LL; Boone JM; Kanal K; Mahesh M; Fleischman RC; Och J; Williams MB; Beideck DJ; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):737-52. PubMed ID: 16878576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
    Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.