These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8779405)

  • 1. [Evaluation of the oscillometric blood pressure monitors: Dinamap 1846 and HP M-1008B].
    Papadopoulos G; Mieke S; Kuhn HJ; Apenburg C
    Anaesthesist; 1996 May; 45(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 8779405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the performances of three oscillometric blood pressure monitors for neonates using a simulator.
    Papadopoulos G; Mieke S; Elisaf M
    Blood Press Monit; 1999 Feb; 4(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 10362888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Arterial blood pressure measurement with oscillometric instruments in newborns and infants].
    Papadopoulos G; Oldörp B; Mieke S
    Anaesthesist; 1994 Jul; 43(7):441-6. PubMed ID: 8092453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simulation study of the consistency of oscillometric blood pressure measurements with and without artefacts.
    Amoore JN
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 10828893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?
    Amoore JN; Scott DH
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 10828894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring ankle systolic blood pressure: validation of the Dinamap 1846 SX.
    Mundt KA; Chambless LE; Burnham CB; Heiss G
    Angiology; 1992 Jul; 43(7):555-66. PubMed ID: 1626733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative evaluation of the DINAMAP 8100 and DINAMAP Compact TS using a non-invasive blood pressure simulator.
    Amoore JN
    Blood Press Monit; 1998 Oct; 3(5):309-314. PubMed ID: 10212371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of high-definition and conventional oscillometric blood pressure measurement in anaesthetised dogs using ACVIM guidelines.
    Wernick M; Doherr M; Howard J; Francey T
    J Small Anim Pract; 2010 Jun; 51(6):318-24. PubMed ID: 20492450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions.
    Whincup PH; Bruce NG; Cook DG; Shaper AG
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Apr; 46(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 1583434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill neonates with reference to the arterial pressure wave shape.
    Gevers M; van Genderingen HR; Lafeber HN; Hack WW
    Intensive Care Med; 1996 Mar; 22(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 8727439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurement on the wrist with invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
    Hager H; Mandadi G; Pulley D; Eagon JC; Mascha E; Nutter B; Kurz A
    Obes Surg; 2009 Jun; 19(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 18618207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.
    Weaver MG; Park MK; Lee DH
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement using the volume clamp method: an evaluation of the CNAP device in intensive care unit patients.
    Wagner JY; Negulescu I; Schöfthaler M; Hapfelmeier A; Meidert AS; Huber W; Schmid RM; Saugel B
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2015 Dec; 29(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 25726179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol.
    de Greeff A; Reggiori F; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 17303988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relative accuracies of two automated noninvasive arterial pressure measurement devices.
    Gorback MS; Quill TJ; Lavine ML
    J Clin Monit; 1991 Jan; 7(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 1999694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of Dinamap 845 automated blood pressure recorder.
    Silas JH; Barker AT; Ramsay LE
    Br Heart J; 1980 Feb; 43(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 7362713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference in critically ill patients.
    Bur A; Hirschl MM; Herkner H; Oschatz E; Kofler J; Woisetschläger C; Laggner AN
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Feb; 28(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 10708169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurements of blood pressure with various techniques in daily practice: uncertainty in diagnosing office hypertension with short-term in-hospital registration of blood pressure.
    Braun HJ; Rabouw H; Werner H; van Montfrans GA; de Stigter C; Zwinderman AH
    Blood Press Monit; 1999 Apr; 4(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10450115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.