These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8779735)

  • 1. Comparison of the photoelastic stress properties for two combination prefabricated cast post systems.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo M; Condos S; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Oral Health; 1995 Aug; 85(8):41-4, 46. PubMed ID: 8779735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the retentive and photoelastic properties of two prefabricated endodontic post systems.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo M; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jun; 26(6):488-94. PubMed ID: 10397181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pilot study comparing the photoelastic stress distribution for four endodontic post systems.
    Cohen BI; Condos S; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Oct; 23(10):679-85. PubMed ID: 8933385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the fractural strength for three combination cast post systems.
    Cohen BI; Newman I; Pagnillo M; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Oral Health; 1996 Jan; 86(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 8779737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the photoelastic stress for a split-shank threaded post versus a threaded post.
    Cohen BI; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthodont; 1994 Mar; 3(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 8061792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention of four endodontic posts cemented with composite resin.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 11199599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
    Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of timing of coronal preparation on retention of two types of post cores.
    Saygili G; Sahmali S; Demirel F
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 18578178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro.
    Hedlund SO; Johansson NG; Sjögren G
    Br Dent J; 2003 Aug; 195(3):155-8; discussion 147. PubMed ID: 12907984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of several protocols for the application of ultrasound during the removal of cast intraradicular posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement.
    Garrido AD; Oliveira AG; Osório JE; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 19467051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fit of tapered posts in root canals luted with zinc phosphate cement: a histological study.
    Schmage P; Ozcan M; McMullan-Vogel C; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2005 Sep; 21(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 15922445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems.
    Fokkinga WA; Kreulen CM; Le Bell-Rönnlöf AM; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK; Creugers NH
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 16776775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis).
    Eskitaşcioğlu G; Belli S; Kalkan M
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):629-33. PubMed ID: 12236304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of surface configuration on the retention of posts designed for use with a cast-on technique.
    Rosin M; Fleissner P; Welk A; Steffen H; Heine B
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Feb; 32(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 12066672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of fatigue testing on core integrity and post microleakage of teeth restored with different post systems.
    Reid LC; Kazemi RB; Meiers JC
    J Endod; 2003 Feb; 29(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 12597713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
    Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tensile dislodgment evaluation of two experimental prefabricated post systems.
    Lepe X; Bales DJ; Johnson GH
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(5):209-12. PubMed ID: 9484174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post-and-core designs cemented with two different cements: an in vitro study. Part I.
    Mezzomo E; Massa F; Libera SD
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Apr; 34(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 12731618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.