These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8780994)

  • 21. Clear speech for adults with a hearing loss: does intervention with communication partners make a difference?
    Caissie R; Campbell MM; Frenette WL; Scott L; Howell I; Roy A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Mar; 16(3):157-71. PubMed ID: 15844741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. III: An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech.
    Picheny MA; Durlach NI; Braida LD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 32(3):600-3. PubMed ID: 2779204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perceptual consequences of native and non-native clear speech.
    Kato M; Baese-Berk MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1246. PubMed ID: 35232086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate.
    Uchanski RM; Choi SS; Braida LD; Reed CM; Durlach NI
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):494-509. PubMed ID: 8783129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
    Markham D; Hazan V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech.
    Picheny MA; Durlach NI; Braida LD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Dec; 29(4):434-46. PubMed ID: 3795886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates.
    Krause JC; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):362-78. PubMed ID: 14759028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in young and older talkers as perceived by young and older listeners.
    Tuomainen O; Hazan V; Davis C; Kim J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):EL28. PubMed ID: 31370622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kewley-Port D; Burkle TZ; Lee JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2365-75. PubMed ID: 17902871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Liu S; Del Rio E; Bradlow AR; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2374-83. PubMed ID: 15532668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Receptive Vocabulary, Cognitive Flexibility, and Inhibitory Control Differentially Predict Older and Younger Adults' Success Perceiving Speech by Talkers With Dysarthria.
    Ingvalson EM; Lansford KL; Fedorova V; Fernandez G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3632-3641. PubMed ID: 29204601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual Speech Benefit in Clear and Degraded Speech Depends on the Auditory Intelligibility of the Talker and the Number of Background Talkers.
    Blackburn CL; Kitterick PT; Jones G; Sumner CJ; Stacey PC
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519837866. PubMed ID: 30909814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings.
    Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Judgments of Emotion in Clear and Conversational Speech by Young Adults With Normal Hearing and Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.
    Morgan SD; Ferguson SH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 60(8):2271-2280. PubMed ID: 28687824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Listeners' attitudes toward accented talkers uniquely predicts accented speech perception.
    Ingvalson EM; Lansford KL; Federova V; Fernandez G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL234. PubMed ID: 28372098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit.
    Bent T; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1600-10. PubMed ID: 14514213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does Time Compression Decrease Intelligibility for Female Talkers More Than for Male Talkers?
    Johnson EM; Morgan SD; Ferguson SH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 63(4):1083-1092. PubMed ID: 32259460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Listeners' perceptions of consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal talkers.
    Doyle PC; Danhauer JL; Reed CG
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Nov; 53(4):400-7. PubMed ID: 3184901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.