BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8781872)

  • 1. Energy consumption of paraplegic locomotion using reciprocating gait orthosis.
    Beillot J; Carré F; Le Claire G; Thoumie P; Perruoin-Verbe B; Cormerais A; Courtillon A; Tanguy E; Nadeau G; Rochcongar P; Dassonville J
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1996; 73(3-4):376-81. PubMed ID: 8781872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Paraplegic adaptation to assisted-walking: energy expenditure during wheelchair versus orthosis use.
    Merati G; Sarchi P; Ferrarin M; Pedotti A; Veicsteinas A
    Spinal Cord; 2000 Jan; 38(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 10762196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Energy consumption in paraplegic ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and electric stimulation of the thigh muscles.
    Hirokawa S; Grimm M; Le T; Solomonow M; Baratta RV; Shoji H; D'Ambrosia RD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Aug; 71(9):687-94. PubMed ID: 2375676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physiologic costs of computer-controlled walking in persons with paraplegia using a reciprocating-gait orthosis.
    Petrofsky JS; Smith JB
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1991 Oct; 72(11):890-6. PubMed ID: 1929807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Energy expenditure during gait using the walkabout and isocentric reciprocal gait orthoses in persons with paraplegia.
    Harvey LA; Davis GM; Smith MB; Engel S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 79(8):945-9. PubMed ID: 9710167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Energy expenditure and fatiguability in paraplegic ambulation using reciprocating gait orthosis and electric stimulation.
    Hirokawa S; Solomonow M; Baratta R; D'Ambrosia R
    Disabil Rehabil; 1996 Mar; 18(3):115-22. PubMed ID: 8695882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Energy expenditure of walking for adult patients with spinal cord lesions using the reciprocating gait orthosis and functional electrical stimulation.
    Sykes L; Campbell IG; Powell ES; Ross ER; Edwards J
    Spinal Cord; 1996 Nov; 34(11):659-65. PubMed ID: 8918962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of gait between healthy participants and persons with spinal cord injury when using the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis.
    Arazpour M; Joghtaei M; Bahramizadeh M; Ahmadi Bani M; Hutchins SW; Curran S; Mousavi ME; Sharifi G; Mardani MA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Apr; 40(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 26195620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ambulation study of a woman with paraplegia using a reciprocating gait orthosis with functional electrical stimulation in Taiwan: a case report.
    Chen WL; Chang WH; Chen CC; Hsieh JC; Shih YY; Chen YL
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 Nov; 4(6):429-38. PubMed ID: 19817657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Energy cost of paraplegic locomotion with the ORLAU ParaWalker.
    Nene AV; Patrick JH
    Paraplegia; 1989 Feb; 27(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 2922207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficiency of walking of paraplegic patients using a reciprocating gait orthosis.
    Bernardi M; Canale I; Castellano V; Di Filippo L; Felici F; Marchetti M
    Paraplegia; 1995 Jul; 33(7):409-15. PubMed ID: 7478731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of trunk extension on physiological cost index in spinal cord injury patients when using the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis: A pilot study.
    Arazpour M; Samadian M; Bahramizadeh M; Ahmadi Bani M; Gharib M; Hosseini SA; Hutchins SW; Mardani MA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Dec; 40(6):696-702. PubMed ID: 26209422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of an innovative hip energy storage walking orthosis for improving paraplegic walking: A pilot randomized controlled study.
    Yang M; Li J; Guan X; Gao L; Gao F; Du L; Zhao H; Yang D; Yu Y; Wang Q; Wang R; Ji L
    Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():91-96. PubMed ID: 28578140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of orthotic gait training with an isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis on the walking ability of paraplegic patients: a pilot study.
    Samadian M; Arazpour M; Ahmadi Bani M; Pouyan A; Bahramizadeh M; Hutchins SW
    Spinal Cord; 2015 Oct; 53(10):754-7. PubMed ID: 26193816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional electrical stimulation and reciprocating gait orthosis for ambulation exercise in a tetraplegic patient: a case study.
    Phillips CA; Hendershot DM
    Paraplegia; 1991 May; 29(4):268-76. PubMed ID: 1870892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Walking with the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis (ARGO) in thoracic paraplegic patients: energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory performance.
    Massucci M; Brunetti G; Piperno R; Betti L; Franceschini M
    Spinal Cord; 1998 Apr; 36(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 9589520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and functional electrical stimulation.
    Isakov E; Douglas R; Berns P
    Paraplegia; 1992 Apr; 30(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 1625891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Physiological Cost Index of walking with an isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis among patients with T(12) - L(1) spinal cord injury.
    Leung AK; Wong AF; Wong EC; Hutchins SW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Mar; 33(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 19235067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the performance of paraplegic subjects during walking with a new design of reciprocal gait orthosis.
    Karimi MT; Fatoye F
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 25069902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physiologic costs of reciprocal gait in FES assisted walking.
    Winchester P; Carollo JJ; Habasevich R
    Paraplegia; 1994 Oct; 32(10):680-6. PubMed ID: 7831075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.