These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8781887)
1. Comparison of an automated enzyme immunoassay with a direct fluorescent antibody test and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in diagnostic specimens from male patients. Tong CY; Valentine C; Arya OP Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Apr; 15(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 8781887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay. Ostergaard L; Møller JK J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confirmation of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay for chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test. Beebe JL; Masters H; Jungkind D; Heltzel DM; Weinberg A Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8946630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lowering the cut off value of an automated chlamydia enzyme immunoassay and confirmation by PCR and direct immunofluorescent antibody test. Tong CY; Donnelly C; Hood N J Clin Pathol; 1997 Aug; 50(8):681-5. PubMed ID: 9301554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find. Hay PE; Thomas BJ; Horner PJ; MacLeod E; Renton AM; Taylor-Robinson D Genitourin Med; 1994 Apr; 70(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 8206484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of urine, first and second endourethral swabs for PCR based detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male patients. Sugunendran H; Birley HD; Mallinson H; Abbott M; Tong CY Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Dec; 77(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 11714940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urethral and urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic male patients by the polymerase chain reaction. Stary A; Choueiri B; Hörting-Müller I; Halisch P; Teodorowicz L Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Jun; 15(6):465-71. PubMed ID: 8839640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of urine with urethral swabs for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in men attending an STD clinic. Ramuthaga TN; Mahomed FM; Greeff AS; Crewe-Brown HH; Vermeulen R S Afr Med J; 1995 Dec; 85(12):1287-9. PubMed ID: 8600586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a sexually transmitted disease clinic: evaluation of a urine sample tested by enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction in comparison with a cervical and/or a urethral swab tested by culture and polymerase chain reaction. Jensen IP; Fogh H; Prag J Clin Microbiol Infect; 2003 Mar; 9(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 12667251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 1-year evaluation of Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay with selective confirmation by direct fluorescent-antibody assay in a high-volume laboratory. Chan EL; Brandt K; Horsman GB J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2208-11. PubMed ID: 7814548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA assay with specimens from women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Pate MS; Dixon PB; Hardy K; Crosby M; Hook EW J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 36(8):2183-6. PubMed ID: 9665987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary tract specimens using an automated enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay. Gun-Munro J; Mahony J; Lyn P; Luinstra K; Smaill F; Richardson H Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8919737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of DNA amplification methods for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic military recruits. Stary A; Tomazic-Allen S; Choueiri B; Burczak J; Steyrer K; Lee H Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 8919734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women. Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by enzyme immunoassay: importance of confirmatory testing. Fonseca K; Megran DW; Anand CM J Clin Pathol; 1995 Mar; 48(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 7730479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for genital chlamydia infection: DNA amplification techniques should be the test of choice. Harindra V; Underhill G; Tobin JM Int J STD AIDS; 2003 Nov; 14(11):723-6. PubMed ID: 14624732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine using enzyme immunoassay and DNA amplification. Rasmussen SJ; Smith-Vaughan H; Nelson M; Chan SW; Timms P; Capon AG Mol Cell Probes; 1993 Dec; 7(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 8145773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunoassay and confirmatory test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in male urine samples. Matthews RS; Pandit PG; Bonigal SD; Wise R; Radcliffe KW Genitourin Med; 1993 Feb; 69(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8444482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Urine as an alternative to urethral swabs for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in infertile males. Ramuthaga TN; Bornman MS; Mahomed MF; Boomker D; Greef AS; Crewe-Brown HH; Reif S Int J Androl; 1994 Feb; 17(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 8005709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in swabs and urine from men with non-gonococcal urethritis. Palmer HM; Gilroy CB; Thomas BJ; Hay PE; Gilchrist C; Taylor-Robinson D J Clin Pathol; 1991 Apr; 44(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 2030152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]