These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8782188)

  • 1. Computation of vascular flow dynamics from intravascular ultrasound images.
    Chandran KB; Vonesh MJ; Roy A; Greenfield S; Kane B; Greene R; McPherson DD
    Med Eng Phys; 1996 Jun; 18(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 8782188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pulsatile flow simulation in arterial vascular segments with intravascular ultrasound images.
    Liu Y; Lai Y; Nagaraj A; Kane B; Hamilton A; Greene R; McPherson DD; Chandran KB
    Med Eng Phys; 2001 Oct; 23(8):583-95. PubMed ID: 11719081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of velocity profiles and retrograde flow in the porcine abdominal aorta under different haemodynamic conditions.
    Pedersen EM; Kim WY; Staalsen NH; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Paulsen PK
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 1999; 33(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 10517207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-dimensional velocity measurements in a pulsatile flow model of the normal abdominal aorta simulating different hemodynamic conditions.
    Pedersen EM; Sung HW; Burlson AC; Yoganathan AP
    J Biomech; 1993 Oct; 26(10):1237-47. PubMed ID: 8253828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of carotid artery geometry on the magnitude and distribution of wall shear stress gradients.
    Wells DR; Archie JP; Kleinstreuer C
    J Vasc Surg; 1996 Apr; 23(4):667-78. PubMed ID: 8627904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simulation environment for validating ultrasonic blood flow and vessel wall imaging based on fluid-structure interaction simulations: ultrasonic assessment of arterial distension and wall shear rate.
    Swillens A; Degroote J; Vierendeels J; Lovstakken L; Segers P
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4318-30. PubMed ID: 20879592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numerical study on the effect of steady axial flow development in the human aorta on local shear stresses in abdominal aortic branches.
    Shipkowitz T; Rodgers VG; Frazin LJ; Chandran KB
    J Biomech; 1998 Nov; 31(11):995-1007. PubMed ID: 9880056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element modeling of three-dimensional pulsatile flow in the abdominal aorta: relevance to atherosclerosis.
    Taylor CA; Hughes TJ; Zarins CK
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1998; 26(6):975-87. PubMed ID: 9846936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 4D model of hemodynamics in the abdominal aorta.
    Zbicinski I; Veshkina N; Stefańczyk L
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S257-64. PubMed ID: 26406010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental and CFD flow studies in an intracranial aneurysm model with Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.
    Frolov SV; Sindeev SV; Liepsch D; Balasso A
    Technol Health Care; 2016 May; 24(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 26835725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors influencing blood flow patterns in the human right coronary artery.
    Myers JG; Moore JA; Ojha M; Johnston KW; Ethier CR
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2001 Feb; 29(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 11284665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Numerical simulation of steady flow in a model of the aortic bifurcation.
    Thiriet M; Pares C; Saltel E; Hecht F
    J Biomech Eng; 1992 Feb; 114(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 1491585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: computational studies with models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects.
    Milner JS; Moore JA; Rutt BK; Steinman DA
    J Vasc Surg; 1998 Jul; 28(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 9685141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time intravascular shear stress in the rabbit abdominal aorta.
    Ai L; Yu H; Dai W; Hale SL; Kloner RA; Hsiai TK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jun; 56(6):1755-64. PubMed ID: 19527952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numerical investigation of the non-Newtonian blood flow in a bifurcation model with a non-planar branch.
    Chen J; Lu XY
    J Biomech; 2004 Dec; 37(12):1899-911. PubMed ID: 15519598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed numerical analysis of the biomechanical effects on coronary atherogenesis using human hemodynamic and dimensional variables.
    Lee BK; Kwon HM; Kim D; Yoon YW; Seo JK; Kim IJ; Roh HW; Suh SH; Yoo SS; Kim HS
    Yonsei Med J; 1998 Apr; 39(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 9587258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability of the planarity of the human aortic bifurcation.
    Friedman MH; Ding Z
    Med Eng Phys; 1998 Sep; 20(6):469-72. PubMed ID: 9796953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of exercise on hemodynamic conditions in the abdominal aorta.
    Taylor CA; Hughes TJ; Zarins CK
    J Vasc Surg; 1999 Jun; 29(6):1077-89. PubMed ID: 10359942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of angiographic and IVUS derived coronary geometric reconstructions for evaluation of the association of hemodynamics with coronary artery disease progression.
    Timmins LH; Suo J; Eshtehardi P; Molony DS; McDaniel MC; Oshinski JN; Giddens DP; Samady H
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1327-1336. PubMed ID: 27229349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemodynamic effects on atherosclerosis-prone coronary artery: wall shear stress/rate distribution and impedance phase angle in coronary and aortic circulation.
    Lee BK; Kwon HM; Hong BK; Park BE; Suh SH; Cho MT; Lee CS; Kim MC; Kim CJ; Yoo SS; Kim HS
    Yonsei Med J; 2001 Aug; 42(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 11519078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.