These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8783052)
1. Root surface smoothness or roughness following open debridement. An in vivo study. Schlageter L; Rateitschak-Plüss EM; Schwarz JP J Clin Periodontol; 1996 May; 23(5):460-4. PubMed ID: 8783052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study. Solís Moreno C; Santos A; Nart J; Levi P; Velásquez A; Sanz Moliner J J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Loss of tooth substance during root planing with various periodontal instruments: an in vitro study. Obeid P; Bercy P Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Jun; 9(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 15838684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one? Drisko CH Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Root debridement of single-rooted teeth with a diamond-coated sonic scaler insert during flap surgery. A pilot study. Kocher T; Plagmann HC J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Apr; 26(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 10223389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Root surface alterations following manual and mechanical scaling: A comparative study. Maritato M; Orazi L; Laurito D; Formisano G; Serra E; Lollobrigida M; Molinari A; De Biase A Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 Nov; 16(4):553-558. PubMed ID: 29797806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits. Kocher T; Langenbeck M; Rühling A; Plagmann HC J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness, adhesion of periodontal ligament fibroblasts, and Streptococcus gordonii following root instrumentation with Gracey curettes and subsequent polishing with diamond-coated curettes. Eick S; Bender P; Flury S; Lussi A; Sculean A Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):397-404. PubMed ID: 22526889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study. Vastardis S; Yukna RA; Rice DA; Mercante D J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips. Yukna RA; Scott JB; Aichelmann-Reidy ME; LeBlanc DM; Mayer ET J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 9182738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth (II). Subgingival roughness. Kocher T; Rosin M; Langenbeck N; Bernhardt O J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Aug; 28(8):723-9. PubMed ID: 11442731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo. Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the effects of various periodontal rotary instruments on surface characteristics of root surface. Kishida M; Sato S; Ito K J Oral Sci; 2004 Mar; 46(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15141717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement. Dassatti L; Manicone PF; Lauricella S; Pastorino R; Filetici P; Nicoletti F; D'Addona A Clin Exp Dent Res; 2020 Aug; 6(4):470-477. PubMed ID: 32573120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of the angle of instrumentation of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler on root surfaces. Oliveira G; Macedo PD; Tsurumaki JN; Sampaio JE; Marcantonio R Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 14(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 25690687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo. Santos FA; Pochapski MT; Leal PC; Gimenes-Sakima PP; Marcantonio E Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Jun; 12(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 18060565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study. Silva D; Martins O; Matos S; Lopes P; Rolo T; Baptista I Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of instrumentation using curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the morphology and adhesion of blood components on root surfaces: a SEM study. Tsurumaki Jdo N; Souto BH; Oliveira GJ; Sampaio JE; Marcantonio Júnior E; Marcantonio RA Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 21915514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology. Drisko CL; Cochran DL; Blieden T; Bouwsma OJ; Cohen RE; Damoulis P; Fine JB; Greenstein G; Hinrichs J; Somerman MJ; Iacono V; Genco RJ; J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1792-801. PubMed ID: 11128930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Removal of simulated biofilm: an evaluation of the effect on root surfaces roughness after scaling. Graetz C; Plaumann A; Wittich R; Springer C; Kahl M; Dörfer CE; El-Sayed KF Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 27233902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]