These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8783052)
21. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments. Bozbay E; Dominici F; Gokbuget AY; Cintan S; Guida L; Aydin MS; Mariotti A; Pilloni A Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentations in root surface planing in vitro. Khosravi M; Bahrami ZS; Atabaki MS; Shokrgozar MA; Shokri F J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 15016018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Root treatment in vivo with a new rotary periodontal instrument: a profilometer study. Keogh TP; Sanz Alonso M; Arias de Luxán J; Navarrete López J Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):853-60. PubMed ID: 20830880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An in vitro comparative study of a reciprocating scaler for root surface debridement. Lee A; Heasman PA; Kelly PJ J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 8636498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An in vitro study of various instruments for root planing. Mengel R; Stelzel M; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L; Diekwisch T Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Dec; 17(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 9497746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Subgingival debridement with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments and assessment of substance removal on extracted teeth. Rühling A; Bernhardt O; Kocher T Quintessence Int; 2005 Jun; 36(6):446-52. PubMed ID: 15954250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of curet and ultrasonics on root surfaces. Cross-Poline GN; Stach DJ; Newman SM Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 8599589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Scaling and root planing without overinstrumentation: hand versus power-driven scalers. Drisko CL Curr Opin Periodontol; 1993; ():78-88. PubMed ID: 8401851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Root surface texture after different scaling modalities. Jacobson L; Blomlöf J; Lindskog S Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Jun; 102(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 8085122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the effects of periodontal rotary instruments and Gracey curettes on root surface characteristics: an in vivo SEM study. Dwivedi S; Verma SJ Quintessence Int; 2012; 43(10):e135-40. PubMed ID: 23115772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Instrumentation of furcation with modified sonic scaler inserts: a study on manikins (II). Kocher T; Tersic-Orth B; Plagmann HC J Clin Periodontol; 1998 Jun; 25(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 9667478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Removal of hard tooth structure by ROOTSHAPE root planing files used with a modified EVA contra-angle. Hugo B; Stassinakis A J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Nov; 22(11):868-76. PubMed ID: 8550864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontal treatment: a review. Arabaci T; Ciçek Y; Canakçi CF Int J Dent Hyg; 2007 Feb; 5(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17250573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effectiveness of different root debridement modalities in open flap surgery. Huerzeler MB; Einsele FT; Leupolz M; Kerkhecker U; Strub JR J Clin Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 25(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 9543190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An in vitro study of oscillating instruments for root planing. Mengel R; Buns C; Stelzel M; Flores-de-Jacoby L J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Sep; 21(8):513-8. PubMed ID: 7989614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Methodology of three-dimensional determination of root surface roughness. Kocher T; Langenbeck N; Rosin M; Bernhardt O J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 12009182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Root debridement of molars with furcation involvement using diamond-coated sonic scaler inserts during flap surgery -- a pilot study. Kocher T; Plagmann HC J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Aug; 26(8):525-30. PubMed ID: 10450813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of a new ultrasonic scaler on fibroblast attachment to root surfaces: a scanning electron microscopy analysis. Kishida M; Sato S; Ito K J Periodontal Res; 2004 Apr; 39(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15009519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Root surface removal with diamond-coated ultrasonic instruments: an in vitro and SEM study. Lavespere JE; Yukna RA; Rice DA; LeBlanc DM J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1281-7. PubMed ID: 8997674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysing root roughness and smear layer relationship by comparing contemporary dental curettes with conventional dental curettes: a randomised controlled trial. Riaz S; Ahmed S; Shabbir S; Khan ZR; Zaidi SJA; Naeem MM; Farooqui WA BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun; 22(1):237. PubMed ID: 35715802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]