These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8783915)

  • 1. Vacuum delivery at The Maternity Hospital Kuala Lumpur: a comparison of metal and silicone cups.
    Lee HY; Subramaniam N; Nordin MM
    Singapore Med J; 1996 Feb; 37(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 8783915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foetal and maternal outcome of vacuum extraction.
    Gachiri JR; Rogo KO
    East Afr Med J; 1991 Jul; 68(7):539-46. PubMed ID: 1756706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of vacuum extraction delivery between the conventional metal cup and the new soft rubber cup.
    Srisomboon J; Piyamongkol W; Sahapong V; Mongkolchaipak S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1998 Jul; 81(7):480-6. PubMed ID: 9676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomised controlled trial of two instruments for vacuum-assisted delivery (Vacca Re-Usable OmniCup and the Bird anterior and posterior cups) to compare failure rates, safety and use effectiveness.
    Mola GD; Kuk JM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Jun; 50(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 20618242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical experience with the Silc Cup Vacuum Extractor.
    Low J; Ng TY; Chew SY
    Singapore Med J; 1993 Apr; 34(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 8266153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomised controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device.
    Attilakos G; Sibanda T; Winter C; Johnson N; Draycott T
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1510-5. PubMed ID: 16225571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi Omnicup versus conventional ventouse cups for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.
    Groom KM; Jones BA; Miller N; Paterson-Brown S
    BJOG; 2006 Feb; 113(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 16411996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The risk of periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage with vacuum extraction of neonates weighing 2000 grams or less.
    Thomas SJ; Morgan MA; Asrat T; Weeks JW
    J Perinatol; 1997; 17(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 9069063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vacuum-assisted delivery.
    Vacca A
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Feb; 16(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 11866494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between metal cup and silicone rubber cup vacuum extractor.
    Loghis C; Pyrgiotis E; Panayotopoulos N; Batalias L; Salamalekis E; Zourlas PA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1992 Jul; 45(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 1511762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors associated with subaponeurotic haemorrhage in full-term infants exposed to vacuum extraction.
    Boo NY; Foong KW; Mahdy ZA; Yong SC; Jaafar R
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1516-21. PubMed ID: 16225572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.
    Macleod M; Strachan B; Bahl R; Howarth L; Goyder K; Van de Venne M; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome.
    Chang X; Chedraui P; Ross MG; Hidalgo L; Peñafiel J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 May; 20(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17674241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized comparison of vacuum extraction delivery with a rigid and a pliable cup.
    Kuit JA; Eppinga HG; Wallenburg HC; Huikeshoven FJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 8336878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.