269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8784400)
1. Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. French Associations for Surgical Research.
Valverde A; Hay JM; Fingerhut A; Elhadad A
Surgery; 1996 Sep; 120(3):476-83. PubMed ID: 8784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Hsu HH; Chen JS; Huang PM; Lee JM; Lee YC
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):1097-101. PubMed ID: 15145015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis.
Walther B; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Von Holstein CS; Zilling T
Ann Surg; 2003 Dec; 238(6):803-12; discussion 812-4. PubMed ID: 14631217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study.
Liu YJ; Fan J; He HH; Zhu SS; Chen QL; Cao RH
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021025. PubMed ID: 30181184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Trans-sutural mechanical anastomosis in esophagogastric surgery. Apropos of 25 cases].
Elhomsy G; Varaei K; Matta W
J Chir (Paris); 1994 Dec; 131(12):546-8. PubMed ID: 7738126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after colonic or rectal resection: a prospective randomized study in 712 patients. French Associations for Surgical Research.
Merad F; Hay JM; Fingerhut A; Flamant Y; Molkhou JM; Laborde Y
Ann Surg; 1998 Feb; 227(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 9488514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevention of anastomotic stricture with a purse-string suture technique on the gastric side during esophageal carcinoma operations: retrospective study of 463 consecutive cases.
Zhang C; Yao MH; Jin T; Sun L; Hu J; Zha YX
World J Surg; 2008 Jun; 32(6):1008-12. PubMed ID: 18338209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Covered self-expanding stent treatment for anastomotic leakage: outcomes in esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses.
Hoeppner J; Kulemann B; Seifert G; Marjanovic G; Fischer A; Hopt UT; Richter-Schrag HJ
Surg Endosc; 2014 May; 28(5):1703-11. PubMed ID: 24380994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic esophagogastric circular stapled anastomosis: a modified technique to protect the esophagus.
Hiki N; Fukunaga T; Yamaguchi T; Nunobe S; Tokunaga M; Ohyama S; Seto Y; Muto T
Gastric Cancer; 2007; 10(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 17922097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis.
Orringer MB; Marshall B; Iannettoni MD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Feb; 119(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 10649203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler: the occurrence of leakage and stricture.
Wong J; Cheung H; Lui R; Fan YW; Smith A; Siu KF
Surgery; 1987 Apr; 101(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 3563886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis with a new stapler in the surgery of esophageal carcinoma.
Chunwei F; Qingzeng N; Jianliang L; Weiji W
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Aug; 28(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 15949948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Urschel JD; Blewett CJ; Bennett WF; Miller JD; Young JE
Dis Esophagus; 2001; 14(3-4):212-7. PubMed ID: 11869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Catastrophic complications of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.
Iannettoni MD; Whyte RI; Orringer MB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Nov; 110(5):1493-500; discussion 1500-1. PubMed ID: 7475201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of anastomotic leakage and stricture formation following layered and stapler oesophagogastric anastomosis for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Zhang YS; Gao BR; Wang HJ; Su YF; Yang YZ; Zhang JH; Wang C
J Int Med Res; 2010; 38(1):227-33. PubMed ID: 20233534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Application of circular staplers in cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection].
CHEN MY; WEI L; WU S; ZHU XM
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 14(9):692-4. PubMed ID: 21948534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research.
Fingerhut A; Elhadad A; Hay JM; Lacaine F; Flamant Y
Surgery; 1994 Sep; 116(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 8079178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
