These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8784609)

  • 1. Comparison of the new API Candida system to the ID 32C system for identification of clinically important yeast species.
    Fricker-Hidalgo H; Vandapel O; Duchesne MA; Mazoyer MA; Monget D; Lardy B; Lebeau B; Freney J; Ambroise-Thomas P; Grillot R
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jul; 34(7):1846-8. PubMed ID: 8784609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates.
    Ramani R; Gromadzki S; Pincus DH; Salkin IF; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3396-8. PubMed ID: 9774605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.
    Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; McGinnis MR; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 May; 34(5):1069-71. PubMed ID: 8727877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct identification and recognition of yeast species from clinical material by using albicans ID and CHROMagar Candida plates.
    Baumgartner C; Freydiere AM; Gille Y
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Feb; 34(2):454-6. PubMed ID: 8789038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the new API Candida system for identification of the most clinically important yeast species.
    Bernal S; Martín Mazuelos E; Chávez M; Coronilla J; Valverde A
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Nov; 32(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 9884839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Milan EP; Malheiros ES; Fischman O; Colombo AL
    Mycopathologia; 1997; 137(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 9368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of Phoenix™ Yeast ID Panel and API® ID 32C commercial systems for the identification of Candida species isolated from clinical samples].
    Gayibova Ü; Dalyan Cılo B; Ağca H; Ener B
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2014 Jul; 48(3):438-48. PubMed ID: 25052110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of clinical yeast isolates by using the Microring YT.
    McGowan KL; Mortensen JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 8432801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
    Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of use of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics for identification of species of the anamorph genus Candida and related teleomorph yeast species.
    Latouche GN; Daniel HM; Lee OC; Mitchell TG; Sorrell TC; Meyer W
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3171-80. PubMed ID: 9399515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of a commercial system for identification of Candida lusitaniae.
    Michel-Nguyen A; Favel A; Chastin C; Selva M; Regli P
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 May; 19(5):393-5. PubMed ID: 10898145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of rapid testing methods for enzyme production with the germ tube method for presumptive identification of Candida albicans.
    Heelan JS; Siliezar D; Coon K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Nov; 34(11):2847-9. PubMed ID: 8897198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auxacolor, a new commercial system for yeast identification: evaluation of 182 strains comparatively with ID 32C.
    Fricker-Hidalgo H; Lebeau B; Kervroedan P; Faure O; Ambroise-Thomas P; Grillot R
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1995; 53(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 7574109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors accounting for misidentification of Candida species.
    Lo HJ; Ho YA; Ho M
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2001 Sep; 34(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 11605807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experience with the MicroSeq D2 large-subunit ribosomal DNA sequencing kit for identification of commonly encountered, clinically important yeast species.
    Hall L; Wohlfiel S; Roberts GD
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Nov; 41(11):5099-102. PubMed ID: 14605145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
    Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of yeasts and yeast-like organisms.
    Graf B; Adam T; Zill E; Göbel UB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 May; 38(5):1782-5. PubMed ID: 10790099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the Microring YT system for identifying clinical yeast isolates.
    Ridgway EJ; Allen KD
    J Clin Pathol; 1991 Sep; 44(9):775-7. PubMed ID: 1918410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the new Micronaut-Candida system compared to the API ID32C method for yeast identification.
    Szabó Z; Tóth B; Kovács M; Kardos G; Maráz A; Rozgonyi F; Majoros L
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 May; 46(5):1824-5. PubMed ID: 18322057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.