These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8785367)

  • 1. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
    Herbert A; Johnson J; Patnick J
    Cytopathology; 1995 Oct; 6(5):301-3. PubMed ID: 8785367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
    Dalla Palma P
    Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):210. PubMed ID: 9202897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting, and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology. Second edition including revised performance indicators.
    Johnson EJ; Patnick J;
    Cytopathology; 2000 Aug; 11(4):212-41. PubMed ID: 10983723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The economics of screening.
    Stewart CJ
    Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):211. PubMed ID: 9202898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the 10% rescreen of negative gynecologic smears as a quality assurance measure.
    Tabbara SO; Sidawy MK
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 8834084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Present standards for cervical cancer screening.
    O'Meara AT
    Curr Opin Oncol; 2002 Sep; 14(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 12192269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Achievable laboratory standards; a review of cytology of 99 women with cervical cancer.
    Womack C; Warren AY
    Cytopathology; 1998 Jun; 9(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 9638378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Setting standards for cervical screening fail-safe mechanisms: a target based on an audit of cytopathology laboratory records.
    Roberts E; Cook GA; Walsworth-Bell JP; Barrow S
    J Med Screen; 1995; 2(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 7497153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical screening: what is the point?
    Robertson J; Woodend B
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The preparation of additional smears from a cervical scrape: impact on the rate of detection of cervical neoplasia.
    Al-Awadhi R; Byrne M; Coleman DV
    Cytopathology; 2001 Jun; 12(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 11380556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unrecognized risks associated with new cervical screening guidelines for younger women.
    Austin RM; Zhao C
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Sep; 135(9):1080. PubMed ID: 21877988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the NHS cervical screening laboratory performance indicators by making allowance for population age, risk and screening interval.
    Blanks RG; Moss SM; Denton K
    Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):323-38. PubMed ID: 17168915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Does screening for HPV solve more problems than it creates?].
    Strander B; Andrae B
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Jun 5-18; 110(23-24):1170. PubMed ID: 23847874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
    van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluable implementation of HPV testing].
    Dillner J; Elfgren K; Törnberg S
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Jun 5-18; 110(23-24):1169-70. PubMed ID: 23847873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical screening: what is the point?
    Soutter WP
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244-5; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical screening: what is the point?
    Denton KJ
    Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical cancer in women aged less than 25: East Kent experience.
    Nair MS; Bhandari HM; Nordin AJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):706-8. PubMed ID: 17999298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective and randomised public-health trial on neural network-assisted screening for cervical cancer in Finland: results of the first year.
    Nieminen P; Hakama M; Viikki M; Tarkkanen J; Anttila A
    Int J Cancer; 2003 Jan; 103(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 12471627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Diagnosis of cervical dysplasias].
    Pérez Dettoma J; Santamaría M; Jurado M; Cabezón C; Domínquez J; de la Fuente F; López García G
    Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1980 Dec; 24(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 7336009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.