These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8785616)

  • 41. Evaluation of proscriptive health care policy implementation in screening mammography.
    Beam CA; Conant EF; Sickles EA; Weinstein SP
    Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):534-40. PubMed ID: 14595152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Radiographers and radiologists reporting plain radiograph requests from accident and emergency and general practice.
    Brealey SD; King DG; Hahn S; Crowe M; Williams P; Rutter P; Crane S
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 16038699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Correlation of radiologist rank as a measure of skill in screening and diagnostic interpretation of mammograms.
    Beam CA; Conant EF; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):446-53. PubMed ID: 16436811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An investigation of radiographers' and radiologists' perceptions and attitudes in Kuwait towards extending radiographers' role in mammography.
    Muhanna AM; Brown PN; Pratt S
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):325-332. PubMed ID: 34782216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Radiographers and trainee radiologists reporting accident radiographs: a comparative plain film-reading performance study.
    Buskov L; Abild A; Christensen A; Holm O; Hansen C; Christensen H
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22935242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Proficiency test in clinical mammography. Results of a consecutive series of 130 volunteer Italian radiologists].
    Ciatto S; Andreoli C; Di Maggio C
    Radiol Med; 1999 Oct; 98(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 10615363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Standardized cine-loop documentation in renal ultrasound facilitates skill-mix between radiographer and radiologist.
    Gaarder M; Seierstad T; Søreng R; Drolsum A; Begum K; Dormagen JB
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 24615418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Perceptions of Australian clients towards male radiographers working in breast imaging: Quantitative results from a pilot study.
    Warren-Forward HM; Mackie B; Alchin M; Mooney T; Fitzpatrick P
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb; 23(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 28290337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Confidence intervals and sample size calculations for studies of film-reading performance.
    Scally AJ; Brealey S
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Mar; 58(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 12639531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of radiographer plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta-analysis.
    Brealey S; Scally A; Hahn S; Thomas N; Godfrey C; Coomarasamy A
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Feb; 60(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 15664578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Screening for breast cancer. Diagnostic performance of radiographers can be improved.
    Loughran CF
    BMJ; 1995 Apr; 310(6985):1003. PubMed ID: 7794377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programme.
    Britton PD; McCann J; O'Driscoll D; Hunnam G; Warren RM
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Jan; 56(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11162697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Re: Can radiographers read screening mammograms?
    Spencer N
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Nov; 58(11):902. PubMed ID: 14581019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Pilot Study on the Development of Remote Quality Control of Digital Mammography Systems in the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
    Looney P; Halling-Brown MD; Oduko JM; Young KC
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 25582530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The influence of a continuing education program on the image interpretation accuracy of rural radiographers.
    Smith TN; Traise P; Cook A
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(2):1145. PubMed ID: 19392573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. An image quality review programme in a population-based mammography screening service.
    Galli V; Pini M; De Metrio D; de Bianchi PS; Bucchi L
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 68(3):253-259. PubMed ID: 34085397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy of after-hour 'red dot' trauma radiograph triage by radiographers in a South African regional hospital.
    Hlongwane ST; Pitcher RD
    S Afr Med J; 2013 Jun; 103(9):638-40. PubMed ID: 24300682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mammographic image quality in relation to positioning of the breast: A multicentre international evaluation of the assessment systems currently used, to provide an evidence base for establishing a standardised method of assessment.
    Taylor K; Parashar D; Bouverat G; Poulos A; Gullien R; Stewart E; Aarre R; Crystal P; Wallis M
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Nov; 23(4):343-349. PubMed ID: 28965899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Multiple film reading in breast cancer screening.
    Sigfússon BF
    Acta Radiol; 2006 Sep; 47(7):623. PubMed ID: 16950692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A program to improve mammography skills of practicing radiologic technologists.
    Gaw VP; Bush SM; D'Orsi CJ; Costanza ME; Karellas A; Dowd M; Zapka JG
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1991 Feb; 17(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 2034440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.