These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8785644)

  • 1. An experimental investigation of the effect of light-box luminance on the detection of low contrast objects in mammography.
    Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):153-9. PubMed ID: 8785644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of ambient light and view box luminance on the detection of calcifications in mammography.
    Kimme-Smith C; Haus AG; DeBruhl N; Bassett LW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 9057533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation into the effects of suboptimal viewing conditions in screen-film mammography.
    Robson KJ
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Mar; 81(963):219-31. PubMed ID: 18270296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of small low-contrast objects in mammography: effect of viewbox masking and luminance.
    Wang J; Gray JE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 9423609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. View box luminance measurements and their effect on reader performance.
    Rill LN; Huda W; Gkanatsios NA
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Sep; 6(9):521-9. PubMed ID: 10894060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search.
    Krupinski E; Roehrig H; Furukawa T
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Jul; 6(7):411-8. PubMed ID: 10410166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Signal detectability of mammography depends on film-screen system and luminance of view box].
    Maeda F; Ogura A; Miyai A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 59(6):746-50. PubMed ID: 12881681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Film viewing conditions in mammography.
    Hill SJ; Faulkner K; Law J; Starritt HC
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Apr; 70(832):409-11. PubMed ID: 9166078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of background structure on the detection of low contrast objects in mammography.
    Kotre CJ
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Nov; 71(851):1162-7. PubMed ID: 10434911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Object detectability at increased ambient lighting conditions.
    Pollard BJ; Chawla AS; Delong DM; Hashimoto N; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2204-13. PubMed ID: 18649449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of luminance on contrast sensitivity and glare in the mesopic range].
    Rassow B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Jun; 214(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 10427544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Complex evaluation of film mammography imaging systems. I. Methodological principles].
    Friedrich M; Weskamp P
    Rofo; 1984 May; 140(5):585-96. PubMed ID: 6429765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Night driving: effects of glare from vehicle headlights on motion perception.
    Anderson SJ; Holliday IE
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Nov; 15(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 8594525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Photometry in the workplace: the rationale for a new method.
    Piccoli B; Soci G; Zambelli PL; Pisaniello D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jan; 48(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 14718343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of the reciprocity law failure in three mammography screen-film systems.
    de Almeida A; Sobol WT; Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 1999 May; 26(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 10360527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 'Double-blindsight' revealed through the processing of color and luminance contrast defined motion signals.
    Barbur JL
    Prog Brain Res; 2004; 144():243-59. PubMed ID: 14650853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Film viewing conditions in mammography.
    Giesberg DJ
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(5):429-31. PubMed ID: 9170188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.