138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8785649)
1. Short communication: a comparison of fine and medium screens for mammography.
Burch A; Law J
Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):182-5. PubMed ID: 8785649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Films, screens and cassettes for mammography.
Law J; Kirkpatrick AE
Br J Radiol; 1989 Feb; 62(734):163-7. PubMed ID: 2924096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New mammography screen/film combinations: imaging characteristics and radiation dose.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Zheutlin J; Gornbein JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Apr; 154(4):713-9. PubMed ID: 2107663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of image quality on 28 mammography X-ray sets in the UK.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70(839):1131-8. PubMed ID: 9536904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of films and screens for mammography.
Kirkpatrick AE; Law J
Br J Radiol; 1987 Jan; 60(709):73-8. PubMed ID: 3814998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implications of using high contrast mammography X-ray film-screen combinations.
Meeson S; Young KC; Rust A; Wallis MG; Cooke J; Ramsdale ML
Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):825-35. PubMed ID: 11560831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of two mammography film-screen combinations designed for standard-cycle processing.
McParland BJ
Br J Radiol; 1999 Jan; 72(853):73-5. PubMed ID: 10341692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The reduction of radiation burden in mammography using film-screen combination systems].
Waegner U; Geissler S; Rosenkranz G
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 2277840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic quality of mammograms obtained with a new low-radiation-dose dual-screen and dual-emulsion film combination.
Wojtasek DA; Teixidor HS; Govoni AF; Gareen IF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2105011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of mammography screen-film combinations.
Schueler BA; Gray JE; Gisvold JJ
Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 1509043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of digital and screen-film mammography using quality control phantoms.
Undrill PE; O'Kane AD; Gilbert FJ
Clin Radiol; 2000 Oct; 55(10):782-90. PubMed ID: 11052880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a new mammographic film: methods and considerations.
Tsalafoutas OA; Kolovos CA; Tsapaki V; Betsou S; Koliakou E; Maniatis PN; Xenofos S
Health Phys; 2008 Apr; 94(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 18332725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of the reciprocity law failure in three mammography screen-film systems.
de Almeida A; Sobol WT; Barnes GT
Med Phys; 1999 May; 26(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 10360527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screen-film and digital mammography. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.
Haus AG; Yaffe MJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):871-98. PubMed ID: 10943284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
