These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8786246)
1. Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of two formulations of cyclosporine A in patients with psoriasis. Elder CA; Moore M; Chang CT; Jin J; Charnick S; Nedelman J; Cohen A; Guzzo C; Lowe N; Simpson K J Clin Pharmacol; 1995 Sep; 35(9):865-75. PubMed ID: 8786246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of pharmacokinetics of Neoral and Sandimmune in stable pediatric liver transplant recipients. van Mourik ID; Thomson M; Kelly DA Liver Transpl Surg; 1999 Mar; 5(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 10071349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized, trough blood cyclosporine concentration-controlled trial to compare the pharmacodynamics of Sandimmune and Neoral in de novo lung transplant recipients. Trull A; Steel L; Sharples L; Stewart S; Parameshwar J; McNeil K; Wallwork J Ther Drug Monit; 1999 Feb; 21(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 10051050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential influence of two cyclosporine formulations on everolimus pharmacokinetics: a clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction. Kovarik JM; Kalbag J; Figueiredo J; Rouilly M; Frazier OL; Rordorf C J Clin Pharmacol; 2002 Jan; 42(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 11808830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A comparative randomized prospective multicenter study of Sandimmune vs Neoral in liver transplantation]. Roy A; Grant DR; Kneteman NM; Tchervenkov JI; Levy GA; Tan A; Hendricks L Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):716-21. PubMed ID: 9846420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in renal allograft recipients--a concentration-controlled comparison with the commercial formulation. Mueller EA; Kovarik JM; van Bree JB; Lison AE; Kutz K Transplantation; 1994 Apr; 57(8):1178-82. PubMed ID: 8178343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy, safety and optimal dose of two formulations of cyclosporin, Neoral and Sandimmun, in patients with severe psoriasis. OLP302 Study Group. Koo J Br J Dermatol; 1998 Jul; 139(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 9764154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neoral use in the cardiac transplant recipient. Valantine H Transplant Proc; 2000 May; 32(3A Suppl):27S-44S. PubMed ID: 10814748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduced intrapatient variability of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients switched from oral Sandimmune to Neoral. Mendez R; Abboud H; Burdick J; Copley B; Freeman R; Batiuk TD; Cooney GF; Barbeito R Clin Ther; 1999 Jan; 21(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 10090433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharmacokinetic, hemodynamic, and metabolic effects of cyclosporine sandimmune versus the microemulsion neoral in heart transplant recipients. White M; Pelletier GB; Tan A; Jesina C; Carrier M J Heart Lung Transplant; 1997 Aug; 16(8):787-94. PubMed ID: 9286770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation of SangCya vs Neoral or Sandimmune in stable renal transplant recipients. Gaston R; Alloway RR; Gaber AO; Rossi SJ; Schroeder TJ; Irish WD; Canafax DM; First MR Transplant Proc; 1999; 31(1-2):326-7. PubMed ID: 10083128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized, double-blind, one-year study of the safety and tolerability of cyclosporine microemulsion compared with conventional cyclosporine in renal transplant patients. International Sandimmun Neoral Study Group. Frei UA; Neumayer HH; Buchholz B; Niese D; Mueller EA Transplantation; 1998 Jun; 65(11):1455-60. PubMed ID: 9645802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in patients following long-term administration after a kidney transplant: comparison of Neoral and Sandimmune. Takahara S; Ichimaru N; Kojima Y; Namba Y; Toki K; Shi Y; Yoshimura K; Matsumiya K; Nonomura N; Okuyama A Transplant Proc; 2004 Mar; 36(2 Suppl):456S-460S. PubMed ID: 15041387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two cyclosporine formulations in healthy volunteers: bioequivalence of the new Sang-35 formulation and Neoral. Schroeder TJ; Cho MJ; Pollack GM; Floc'h R; Moran HB; Levy R; Moore LW; Pouletty P J Clin Pharmacol; 1998 Sep; 38(9):807-14. PubMed ID: 9753208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of cyclosporin A pharmacokinetics of a new microemulsion formulation and standard oral preparation in patients with psoriasis. Erkko P; Granlund H; Nuutinen M; Reitamo S Br J Dermatol; 1997 Jan; 136(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 9039300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neoral compared to Sandimmune is associated with a decrease in histologic severity of rejection in patients undergoing primary liver transplantation. Graziadei IW; Wiesner RH; Marotta PJ; Porayko MK; Dahlke LJ; Wilson SM; Steers JL; Krom RA Transplantation; 1997 Sep; 64(5):726-31. PubMed ID: 9311710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effect of diltiazem on concentration of cyclosporin metabolites in Sandimmune and Neoral treated kidney transplant patients]. Sperschneider H; Wagner C; Korn A; Christians U Med Klin (Munich); 1997 Oct; 92(10):589-96. PubMed ID: 9446006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ISA 247: trans-ISA 247, trans-R 1524, ISA(TX)247, ISAtx 247, ISATx247, LX 211, LX211, R 1524, R-1524. Drugs R D; 2007; 8(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 17324008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to convert from traditional cyclosporine to the microemulsion formulation in stable renal transplant patients? Gaspari F; Perico N; Pisoni R; Anedda MF; Signorini O; Caruso R; Gotti E; Remuzzi G Clin Transplant; 1998 Oct; 12(5):379-90. PubMed ID: 9787945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]