These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8786931)

  • 1. Measurement of genetic parameters within and between turkey lines using DNA fingerprinting.
    Zhu J; Nestor KE; Patterson RA; Jackwood DJ; Emmerson DA
    Poult Sci; 1996 Apr; 75(4):439-46. PubMed ID: 8786931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic diversity of commercial turkey primary breeding lines as estimated by DNA fingerprinting.
    Ye X; Zhu J; Velleman SG; Nestor KE
    Poult Sci; 1998 Jun; 77(6):802-7. PubMed ID: 9628526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between band sharing levels of DNA fingerprints and inbreeding coefficients and estimation of true inbreeding in turkey lines.
    Zhu J; Nestor KE; Moritsu Y
    Poult Sci; 1996 Jan; 75(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8650106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of genetic variation within and between Japanese quail lines using DNA fingerprinting.
    Ye X; Zhu J; Velleman SG; Bacon WL; Nestor KE
    Poult Sci; 1998 Dec; 77(12):1755-8. PubMed ID: 9872574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of new major histocompatibility complex class II restriction fragment length polymorphisms in a closed experimental line of Beltsville Small White turkeys.
    Sacco RE; Rimler RB; Ye X; Nestor KE
    Poult Sci; 2001 Aug; 80(8):1109-11. PubMed ID: 11495462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequencies and genetic diversity of major histocompatibility complex class II haplotypes in commercial turkey lines.
    Zhu J; Nestor KE; Tang Y
    Poult Sci; 1996 Aug; 75(8):954-8. PubMed ID: 8829225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of DNA fingerprinting for determining genetic diversity in sheep populations.
    Hermans IF; Morris CA; Chambers GK; Towers NR; Jordan TW
    Anim Genet; 1993 Oct; 24(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 8291740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of heterozygosity for single-probe multilocus DNA fingerprints.
    Stephens JC; Gilbert DA; Yuhki N; O'Brien SJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 1992 Jul; 9(4):729-43. PubMed ID: 1630309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of DNA fingerprints for cell-line individualization.
    Gilbert DA; Reid YA; Gail MH; Pee D; White C; Hay RJ; O'Brien SJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Sep; 47(3):499-514. PubMed ID: 1975479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DNA fingerprinting in roe deer using the digoxigenated probe (GTG)5.
    Mörsch G; Leibenguth F
    Anim Genet; 1994 Feb; 25(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8161017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of genetic variation within and between different chicken lines by DNA fingerprinting.
    Ponsuksili S; Wimmers K; Horst P
    J Hered; 1998; 89(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 9487676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey of major histocompatibility complex class II haplotypes in four turkey lines using restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis with nonradioactive DNA detection.
    Zhu J; Nestor KE; Lamont SJ
    Poult Sci; 1995 Jul; 74(7):1067-73. PubMed ID: 7479483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nondetectability of restriction fragments and independence of DNA fragment sizes within and between loci in RFLP typing of DNA.
    Chakraborty R; Zhong Y; Jin L; Budowle B
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Aug; 55(2):391-401. PubMed ID: 7913584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimates of relatedness and inbreeding in goose strains from DNA fingerprints.
    Grunder AA; Sabour MP; Gavora JS
    Anim Genet; 1994 Jun; 25 Suppl 1():81-8. PubMed ID: 7943988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic characterization of biodiversity in highly inbred chicken lines by microsatellite markers.
    Zhou H; Lamont SJ
    Anim Genet; 1999 Aug; 30(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 10467700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic diversity among commercial chicken populations estimated from DNA fingerprints.
    Dunnington EA; Stallard LC; Hillel J; Siegel PB
    Poult Sci; 1994 Aug; 73(8):1218-25. PubMed ID: 7971663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic characterization of highly inbred chicken lines by two DNA methods: DNA fingerprinting and polymerase chain reaction using arbitrary primers.
    Plotsky Y; Kaiser MG; Lamont SJ
    Anim Genet; 1995 Jun; 26(3):163-70. PubMed ID: 7793683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The turkey major histocompatibility complex: identification of class II genotypes by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid.
    Emara MG; Nestor KE; Foster DN; Lamont SJ
    Poult Sci; 1992 Dec; 71(12):2083-9. PubMed ID: 1361674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative genetic analysis of the Irish greyhound population using multilocus DNA fingerprinting, canine single locus minisatellites and canine microsatellites.
    Sutton MD; Holmes NG; Brennan FB; Binns MM; Kelly EP; Duke EJ
    Anim Genet; 1998 Jun; 29(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 9720174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic similarity using DNA fingerprinting in cattle to determine relationship coefficient.
    Mannen H; Tsuji S; Mukai F; Goto N; Ohtagaki S
    J Hered; 1993; 84(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 8228169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.