139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8789218)
1. Evaluation of human skin irritation by carboxylic acids, alcohols, esters and aldehydes, with nitrocellulose-replica method and closed patch testing.
Sato A; Obata K; Ikeda Y; Ohkoshi K; Okumura H; Ozawa N; Ogawa T; Katsumura Y; Kawai J; Tatsumi H; Honoki S; Hiramatsu I; Hiroyama H; Okada T; Kozuka T
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jan; 34(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 8789218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of skin irritancy of sodium lauryl sulphate: a comparative study between the replica method and visual evaluation.
Kawai K; Nakagawa M; Kawai J; Kawai K
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Sep; 27(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 1451463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 15059174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skin irritation from air-oxidized ethoxylated surfactants.
Bodin A; Fischer T; Bergh M; Nilsson JL; Karlberg AT
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Aug; 43(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 10945746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How irritant is alcohol?
Löffler H; Kampf G; Schmermund D; Maibach HI
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Jul; 157(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17578437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Less skin irritation from alcohol-based disinfectant than from detergent used for hand disinfection.
Pedersen LK; Held E; Johansen JD; Agner T
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Dec; 153(6):1142-6. PubMed ID: 16307649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of objective and sensory skin irritations of several cosmetic preservatives.
Lee E; An S; Choi D; Moon S; Chang I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Mar; 56(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 17295686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair: evaluation of a cumulative human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Dec; 31(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 7962781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative assessment of the acute skin irritation potential of detergent formulations using a novel human 4-h patch test method.
Robinson MK; Kruszewski FH; Al-Atrash J; Blazka ME; Gingell R; Heitfeld FA; Mallon D; Snyder NK; Swanson JE; Casterton PL
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Dec; 43(12):1703-12. PubMed ID: 16026914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term effects of alcohol-based disinfectant and detergent on skin irritation.
Pedersen LK; Held E; Johansen JD; Agner T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Feb; 52(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 15725285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of skin sensitization response of dialkyl (C6-C13) phthalate esters.
Medeiros AM; Devlin DJ; Keller LH
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Nov; 41(5):287-9. PubMed ID: 10554065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Irritant contact dermatitis. Part II. Evaluation evaluation of skin irritation potential of chemicals].
Chomiczewska D; Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B
Med Pr; 2009; 60(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 19746889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicentre study for the development of an in vivo model to evaluate the influence of topical formulations on irritation.
Schnetz E; Diepgen TL; Elsner P; Frosch PJ; Klotz AJ; Kresken J; Kuss O; Merk H; Schwanitz HJ; Wigger-Alberti W; Fartasch M
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jun; 42(6):336-43. PubMed ID: 10871097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual assessment of human skin irritation: a sensitive and reproducible tool.
Basketter D; Reynolds F; Rowson M; Talbot C; Whittle E
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Nov; 37(5):218-20. PubMed ID: 9412749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancement of visual scoring of skin irritant reactions using cross-polarized light and parallel-polarized light.
Farage MA
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 18279152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The irritant potential of n-propanol (nonanoic acid vehicle) in cumulative skin irritation: a validation study of two different human in vivo test models.
Clemmensen A; Andersen F; Petersen TK; Kalden H; Melgaard A; Andersen KE
Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 19159372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a human patch test for the identification and classification of skin irritation potential.
York M; Griffiths HA; Whittle E; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Mar; 34(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 8833466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of irritant skin reactions using electrical impedance--a comparison between 2 laboratories.
Kuzmina N; Duval C; Johnsson S; Boman A; Lindberg M; Emtestam L
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jul; 49(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 14641117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
