These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8789811)

  • 1. Contralateral acoustic stimulation induces a phase advance in evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Giraud AL; Perrin E; Chéry-Croze S; Chays A; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):54-62. PubMed ID: 8789811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suppression of otoacoustic emission is unchanged after several minutes of contralateral acoustic stimulation.
    Giraud AL; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S
    Hear Res; 1997 Jul; 109(1-2):78-82. PubMed ID: 9259237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of contralateral noise on distortion product latency in humans: is the medial olivocochlear efferent system involved?
    Giraud AL; Wable J; Chays A; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2219-27. PubMed ID: 9348679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contralaterally evoked transient otoacoustic emissions.
    Pratt H; Shi Y; Polyakov A
    Hear Res; 1998 Jan; 115(1-2):39-44. PubMed ID: 9472734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Efferent suppression test--sensitivity and specificity].
    Lisowska G; Namysłowski G; Misiołek M; Scierski W; Orecka B; Czecior E; Dziendziel A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 19205524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Apr; 77(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 9114234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
    Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ryan S; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8789819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Zhao W; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 19798532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence of a medial olivocochlear involvement in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Giraud AL; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S; Magnan J; Chays A
    Brain Res; 1995 Dec; 705(1-2):15-23. PubMed ID: 8821728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
    Stuart A; Preast JL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time course of the medial olivocochlear efferent effect on otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Moulin A; Carrier S
    Neuroreport; 1998 Nov; 9(16):3741-4. PubMed ID: 9858389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise.
    Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Hurley AE; Wen H; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1995 Jul; 87(1-2):96-103. PubMed ID: 8567448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.