These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8790167)
1. Diagnosis of palpable breast lesions in younger women by the modified triple test is accurate and cost-effective. Vetto JT; Pommier RF; Schmidt WA; Eppich H; Alexander PW Arch Surg; 1996 Sep; 131(9):967-72; discussion 972-4. PubMed ID: 8790167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the "triple test" for palpable breast lesions yields high diagnostic accuracy and cost savings. Vetto J; Pommier R; Schmidt W; Wachtel M; DuBois P; Jones M; Thurmond A Am J Surg; 1995 May; 169(5):519-22. PubMed ID: 7747833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accurate evaluation of palpable breast masses by the triple test score. Morris A; Pommier RF; Schmidt WA; Shih RL; Alexander PW; Vetto JT Arch Surg; 1998 Sep; 133(9):930-4. PubMed ID: 9749842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities. Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of fine needle aspiration for solid breast lesions is accurate and cost-effective. Rubin M; Horiuchi K; Joy N; Haun W; Read R; Ratzer E; Fenoglio M Am J Surg; 1997 Dec; 174(6):694-6; discussion 697-8. PubMed ID: 9409599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer. Steinberg JL; Trudeau ME; Ryder DE; Fishell E; Chapman JA; McCready DR; Fish EB; Hiraki GY; Ross TM; Lickley LA Can J Surg; 1996 Aug; 39(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 8697321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Palpable discrete breast masses in young women: two of the components of the modified triple test may be adequate. Ngotho J; Githaiga J; Kaisha W S Afr J Surg; 2013 May; 51(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 23725894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Triple assessment of breast lump. Ahmed I; Nazir R; Chaudhary MY; Kundi S J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2007 Sep; 17(9):535-8. PubMed ID: 17903400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A modified triple test for palpable breast masses: the value of ultrasound and core needle biopsy. Wai CJ; Al-Mubarak G; Homer MJ; Goldkamp A; Samenfeld-Specht M; Lee Y; Logvinenko T; Rothschild JG; Graham RA Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):850-5. PubMed ID: 23104707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of the triple test score for palpable breast masses; discussion 1012-3. Morris KT; Pommier RF; Morris A; Schmidt WA; Beagle G; Alexander PW; Toth-Fejel S; Schmidt J; Vetto JT Arch Surg; 2001 Sep; 136(9):1008-12. PubMed ID: 11529822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of fine-needle aspiration in the evaluation of persistent palpable dominant breast masses. Hindle WH; Payne PA; Pan EY Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 168(6 Pt 1):1814-8; discussion 1818-9. PubMed ID: 8317526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The value of aspiration cytology within the scope of triple diagnosis of palpable breast changes]. Schuhmann R; Hübner F; Brose C; Eckel S; Geier G; Kraus H; Schöndorf H; Schöndorf NK Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Oct; 55(10):553-8. PubMed ID: 8543127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation. Ariga R; Bloom K; Reddy VB; Kluskens L; Francescatti D; Dowlat K; Siziopikou P; Gattuso P Am J Surg; 2002 Nov; 184(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 12433603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate and cost-effective evaluation of breast masses in males. Vetto J; Schmidt W; Pommier R; DiTomasso J; Eppich H; Wood W; Moseson D Am J Surg; 1998 May; 175(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 9600283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: combined physical examination, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration. Kaufman Z; Shpitz B; Shapiro M; Rona R; Lew S; Dinbar A J Surg Oncol; 1994 Aug; 56(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 8057655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new score for the evaluation of palpable breast masses in women under age 40. Morris KT; Vetto JT; Petty JK; Lum SS; Schmidt WA; Toth-Fejel S; Pommier RF Am J Surg; 2002 Oct; 184(4):346-7. PubMed ID: 12383898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration. Hindle WH; Chen EC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2. PubMed ID: 9215186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the triple test score to traditional methods for evaluating palpable breast masses. Morris AM; Flowers CR; Morris KT; Schmidt WA; Pommier RF; Vetto JT Med Care; 2003 Aug; 41(8):962-71. PubMed ID: 12886175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management]. Kocjan G Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of triple test score in the diagnosis of palpable breast lump. Ghimire B; Khan MI; Bibhusal T; Singh Y; Sayami P JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(172):189-92. PubMed ID: 19079392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]