These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8790461)

  • 1. Reconstructing trees when sequence sites evolve at variable rates.
    Steel MA; Székely LA; Hendy MD
    J Comput Biol; 1994; 1(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 8790461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifiability of the unrooted species tree topology under the coalescent model with time-reversible substitution processes, site-specific rate variation, and invariable sites.
    Chifman J; Kubatko L
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Jun; 374():35-47. PubMed ID: 25791286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying evolutionary trees and substitution parameters for the general Markov model with invariable sites.
    Allman ES; Rhodes JA
    Math Biosci; 2008 Jan; 211(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 17964612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing a statistically powerful measure for quartet tree inference using phylogenetic identities and Markov invariants.
    Sumner JG; Taylor A; Holland BR; Jarvis PD
    J Math Biol; 2017 Dec; 75(6-7):1619-1654. PubMed ID: 28434023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do tree split probabilities determine the branch lengths?
    Chor B; Steel M
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Jun; 374():54-9. PubMed ID: 25843219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint Bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny.
    Redelings BD; Suchard MA
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):401-18. PubMed ID: 16012107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What can and what cannot be inferred from pairwise sequence comparisons?
    Baake E
    Math Biosci; 1998 Dec; 154(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 9990805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consistency of Bayesian inference of resolved phylogenetic trees.
    Steel M
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Nov; 336():246-9. PubMed ID: 23973478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling the ancestral sequence distribution and model frequencies in context-dependent models for primate non-coding sequences.
    Baele G; Van de Peer Y; Vansteelandt S
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 10():244. PubMed ID: 20698960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disk-covering, a fast-converging method for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
    Huson DH; Nettles SM; Warnow TJ
    J Comput Biol; 1999; 6(3-4):369-86. PubMed ID: 10582573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the inference of large phylogenies with long branches: how long is too long?
    Mossel E; Roch S; Sly A
    Bull Math Biol; 2011 Jul; 73(7):1627-44. PubMed ID: 20931293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the tangle: a consistent construction of phylogenetic distance matrices for quartets.
    Sumner JG; Jarvis PD
    Math Biosci; 2006 Nov; 204(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 16904133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Very fast algorithms for evaluating the stability of ML and Bayesian phylogenetic trees from sequence data.
    Waddell PJ; Kishino H; Ota R
    Genome Inform; 2002; 13():82-92. PubMed ID: 14571377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Invariable sites models and their use in phylogeny reconstruction.
    Steel M; Huson D; Lockhart PJ
    Syst Biol; 2000 Jun; 49(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 12118406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling heterotachy in phylogenetic inference by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo.
    Pagel M; Meade A
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):3955-64. PubMed ID: 18852097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rate matrices for analyzing large families of protein sequences.
    Devauchelle C; Grossmann A; Hénaut A; Holschneider M; Monnerot M; Risler JL; Torrésani B
    J Comput Biol; 2001; 8(4):381-99. PubMed ID: 11571074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shrinkage effect in ancestral maximum likelihood.
    Mossel E; Roch S; Steel M
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):126-33. PubMed ID: 19179706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the accuracies of several phylogenetic methods using protein and DNA sequences.
    Hall BG
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):792-802. PubMed ID: 15590907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.