These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8790517)

  • 21. The impact of reminder letters on attendance for breast cancer screening.
    Hayes C; O'Herlihy B; Hynes M; Johnson Z
    Ir J Med Sci; 1999; 168(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 10098340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reinvitation to screening colonoscopy: a randomized-controlled trial of reminding letter and invitation to educational meeting on attendance in nonresponders to initial invitation to screening colonoscopy (REINVITE).
    Pisera M; Kaminski MF; Kraszewska E; Rupinski M; Regula J
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 May; 28(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 26967693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Compliance with mammography screening in Israeli women: the impact of a pre-scheduled appointment and of the letter-style.
    Ore L; Hagoel L; Shifroni G; Rennert G
    Isr J Med Sci; 1997 Feb; 33(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 9254871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factors affecting participation in mammography screening.
    McNoe B; Richardson AK; Elwood JM
    N Z Med J; 1996 Sep; 109(1030):359-61. PubMed ID: 8890861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A randomized trial of the impact of risk assessment and feedback on participation in mammography screening.
    Curry SJ; Taplin SH; Anderman C; Barlow WE; McBride C
    Prev Med; 1993 May; 22(3):350-60. PubMed ID: 8327418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Psychological predictors of attendance at annual breast screening examinations.
    Burton MV; Warren R; Price D; Earl H
    Br J Cancer; 1998 Jun; 77(11):2014-9. PubMed ID: 9667685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A randomised trial of invitations to attend for screening mammography.
    Turnbull D; Irwig L; Adelson P
    Aust J Public Health; 1991 Mar; 15(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 2025672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effectiveness of invitations from general practitioners in recruiting women to mammographic screening.
    Dorsch MM; Cheok F; Ingham HM
    Med J Aust; 1991 Nov; 155(9):623-5. PubMed ID: 1943962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A randomized trial of the use of print material and personal contact to improve mammography uptake among screening non-attenders in Singapore.
    Seow A; Straughan PT; Ng EH; Lee HP
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1998 Nov; 27(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 10101560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
    Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effectiveness of an enhanced invitation letter on uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic quasi-randomised controlled trial.
    Sallis A; Bunten A; Bonus A; James A; Chadborn T; Berry D
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Mar; 17():35. PubMed ID: 27009045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening invitation letters.
    Decker KM; Turner D; Demers AA; Martens PJ; Lambert P; Chateau D
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2013 Aug; 22(8):687-93. PubMed ID: 23915107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Promoting participation in a population screening program for breast and cervical cancer: a randomized trial of different invitation strategies.
    Segnan N; Senore C; Giordano L; Ponti A; Ronco G
    Tumori; 1998; 84(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 9678615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Strategies for increasing women participation in community breast cancer screening.
    Bonfill X; Marzo M; Pladevall M; Martí J; Emparanza JI
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; 2001(1):CD002943. PubMed ID: 11279781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A community peer-volunteer telephone reminder call to increase breast cancer-screening attendance.
    Goelen G; De Clercq G; Hanssens S
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2010 Jul; 37(4):E312-7. PubMed ID: 20591795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. General practitioners and mammographic screening uptake: influence of different modalities of general practitioner participation. Working Group.
    Giorgi D; Giordano L; Senore C; Merlino G; Negri R; Cancian M; Lerda M; Segnan N; Del Turco MR
    Tumori; 2000; 86(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 10855848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Screening mammography participation and invitational strategy: the Quebec Breast Cancer Screening Program, 1998-2000.
    Jean S; Major D; Rochette L; Brisson J
    Chronic Dis Can; 2005; 26(2-3):52-8. PubMed ID: 16251010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recruitment for breast screening in a rural practice. Trial of a physician's letter of invitation.
    Bass B; Pross D; Bell P
    Can Fam Physician; 1994 Oct; 40():1730-9. PubMed ID: 7950468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.