These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8790517)

  • 41. Screening sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial of invitation style.
    Gray M; Pennington CR
    Health Bull (Edinb); 2000 Mar; 58(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 12813842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of invitation schemes on breast cancer screening coverage: A cohort study from Copenhagen, Denmark.
    Jacobsen KK; von Euler Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2017 Mar; 24(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27206815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of issuing an invitation for breast cancer screening to women aged 65 to 69.
    Hendry PJ; Entwistle C
    J Med Screen; 1996; 3(2):88-9. PubMed ID: 8849767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Psychosocial predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening.
    Aro AR; de Koning HJ; Absetz P; Schreck M
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 10444726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Do women who intermittently attend breast screening differ from those who attend every invitation and those who never attend?
    Coyle C; Kinnear H; Rosato M; Mairs A; Hall C; O'Reilly D
    J Med Screen; 2014 Jun; 21(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 24803479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Factors affecting women's response to an invitation to attend for a second breast cancer screening examination.
    Orton M; Fitzpatrick R; Fuller A; Mant D; Mlynek C; Thorogood M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Aug; 41(349):320-2. PubMed ID: 1777275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Telephone counseling and attendance in a national mammography-screening program a randomized controlled trial.
    Hegenscheid K; Hoffmann W; Fochler S; Domin M; Weiss S; Hartmann B; Bick U; Hosten N
    Am J Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 41(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 21961470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impact of second reminder invitation on uptake of screening and cancer detection in BreastCheck.
    Fleming P; Mooney T; Fitzpatrick P
    Ir Med J; 2012 Jan; 105(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 22397204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The use of text messages as an alternative invitation method for breast cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial (M-TICS study).
    Vives N; Vidal C; de Guzman EN; Farre A; Panera JA; Binefa G; Garcia M;
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0306720. PubMed ID: 39208325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
    Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Randomised trial of prostate cancer screening in The Netherlands: assessment of acceptance and motives for attendance.
    Nijs HG; Tordoir DM; Schuurman JH; Kirkels WJ; Schröder FH
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9275269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Patient compliance with colorectal cancer screening in general practice.
    Mant D; Fuller A; Northover J; Astrop P; Chivers A; Crockett A; Clements S; Lawrence M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1992 Jan; 42(354):18-20. PubMed ID: 1586526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect on attendance at breast cancer screening of adding a self administered questionnaire to the usual invitation to breast screening in southern England.
    Banks E; Richardson A; Beral V; Crossley B; Simmonds M; Hilton E; English R; Davis J; Austoker J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1998 Feb; 52(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 9578859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Does telephone contact with a physician's office staff improve mammogram screening rates?
    Bodiya A; Vorias D; Dickson HA
    Fam Med; 1999 May; 31(5):324-6. PubMed ID: 10407709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Breast cancer screening--prevalence of disease in women who only respond after an invitation reminder.
    Hofvind S
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(1):21-2. PubMed ID: 17362567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A randomized controlled trial comparing three invitation strategies in a breast cancer screening program.
    Segura JM; Castells X; Casamitjana M; Macià F; Porta M; Katz SJ
    Prev Med; 2001 Oct; 33(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 11570837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a clinical intervention to increase mammography utilization in an inner city public health hospital.
    Thompson B; Thompson LA; Andersen MR; Hager S; Taylor V; Urban N
    Prev Med; 2002 Jul; 35(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 12079445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.