These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8790529)

  • 1. Tailored written invitations for second round breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.
    Meldrum P; Turnbull D; Dobson HM; Colquhoun C; Gilmour WH; McIlwaine GM
    J Med Screen; 1994 Oct; 1(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 8790529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving breast screening uptake: persuading initial non-attenders to attend.
    Turner KM; Wilson BJ; Gilbert FJ
    J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 8790517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Written information needs of women who are recalled for further investigation of breast screening: results of a multicentre study.
    Austoker J; Ong G
    J Med Screen; 1994 Oct; 1(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 8790528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomised trial of invitations to attend for screening mammography.
    Turnbull D; Irwig L; Adelson P
    Aust J Public Health; 1991 Mar; 15(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 2025672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomised controlled trial comparing uptake of NHS Health Check in response to standard letters, risk-personalised letters and telephone invitations.
    Gidlow CJ; Ellis NJ; Riley V; Chadborn T; Bunten A; Iqbal Z; Ahmed A; Fisher A; Sugden D; Clark-Carter D
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):224. PubMed ID: 30791884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.
    Schofield PE; Cockburn J; Hill DJ; Reading D
    J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 8790507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can postal prompts from general practitioners improve the uptake of breast screening? A randomised controlled trial in one east London general practice.
    O'Connor AM; Griffiths CJ; Underwood MR; Eldridge S
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 9575461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of reminder letters on attendance for breast cancer screening.
    Hayes C; O'Herlihy B; Hynes M; Johnson Z
    Ir J Med Sci; 1999; 168(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 10098340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving uptake in non-attenders of breast screening: selective use of second appointment.
    Stead MJ; Wallis MG; Wheaton ME
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 9718524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of invitations from general practitioners in recruiting women to mammographic screening.
    Dorsch MM; Cheok F; Ingham HM
    Med J Aust; 1991 Nov; 155(9):623-5. PubMed ID: 1943962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomised trial of general practitioner-written invitations to encourage attendance at screening mammography.
    Irwig L; Turnbull D; McMurchie M
    Community Health Stud; 1990; 14(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 2073774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictors of non-attendance for second round mammography in an Australian mammographic screening programme.
    O'Byrne AM; Kavanagh AM; Ugoni A; Diver F
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 11202585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?
    Van Hal G; Matthyssen M; Thibaut A; Weyler J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Apr; 47(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 10367299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two primary care interventions aimed at improving attendance for breast screening.
    Richards SH; Bankhead C; Peters TJ; Austoker J; Hobbs FD; Brown J; Tydeman C; Roberts L; Formby J; Redman V; Wilson S; Sharp DJ
    J Med Screen; 2001; 8(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 11480450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do general practitioners influence the uptake of breast cancer screening?
    Majeed FA; Cook DG; Given-Wilson R; Vecchi P; Poloniecki J
    J Med Screen; 1995; 2(3):119-24. PubMed ID: 8536178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The psychological effects of breast screening in terms of patients' perceived health anxieties.
    Swanson V; McIntosh IB; Power KG; Dobson H
    Br J Clin Pract; 1996; 50(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 8733330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A pilot telephone intervention to increase uptake of breast cancer screening in socially deprived areas in Scotland (TELBRECS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Chambers JA; O'Carroll RE; Cook A; Cavanagh J; Archibald D; Millar R
    BMC Public Health; 2014 Aug; 14():824. PubMed ID: 25106506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.