These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8790529)

  • 41. The National Patient Notification Exercise: How well did local breast screening services cope with the additional workload?
    Zelenyanszki C; McAvinchey R; Hudson S
    J Med Screen; 2021 Jun; 28(2):177-184. PubMed ID: 32700625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A randomised trial of the effect of postal reminders on attendance for breast screening.
    Allgood PC; Maxwell AJ; Hudson S; Offman J; Hutchison G; Beattie C; Tuano-Donnelly R; Threlfall A; Summersgill T; Bellis L; Robinson C; Heaton S; Patnick J; Duffy SW
    Br J Cancer; 2016 Jan; 114(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 26784123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Once is enough--why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme.
    Elwood M; McNoe B; Smith T; Bandaranayake M; Doyle TC
    N Z Med J; 1998 May; 111(1066):180-3. PubMed ID: 9640316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
    Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Personal invitations for population-based breast cancer screening.
    Saalasti-Koskinen U; Mäkelä M; Saarenmaa I; Autti-Rämö I
    Acad Radiol; 2009 May; 16(5):546-50. PubMed ID: 19345895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of false positive breast screening examinations on subsequent attendance: retrospective cohort study.
    Maxwell AJ; Beattie C; Lavelle J; Lyburn I; Sinnatamby R; Garnett S; Herbert A
    J Med Screen; 2013 Jun; 20(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 24009091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Psychosocial predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening.
    Aro AR; de Koning HJ; Absetz P; Schreck M
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 10444726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect on breast cancer screening response in The Netherlands of inviting women for an additional scientific investigation.
    Peeters PH; Beckers CG; Hogervorst JM; Collette HJ
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Apr; 48(2):175-7. PubMed ID: 8189174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effectiveness of an enhanced invitation letter on uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic quasi-randomised controlled trial.
    Sallis A; Bunten A; Bonus A; James A; Chadborn T; Berry D
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Mar; 17():35. PubMed ID: 27009045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Breast cancer screening programme as setting for an adjunct research project: effect on programme attendance.
    Gram IT; Lund E
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 18416955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Breast cancer early detection, health beliefs, and cancer worries in randomly selected women with and without a family history of breast cancer.
    Cohen M
    Psychooncology; 2006 Oct; 15(10):873-83. PubMed ID: 16374894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cumulative attendance, assessment and cancer detection rate over four screening rounds in five English breast-screening programmes: a retrospective study.
    Wallis M; Neilson F; Hogarth H; Whitaker C; Faulkner K
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2007 Sep; 29(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 17522078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. What is the psychological impact of mammographic screening on younger women with a family history of breast cancer? Findings from a prospective cohort study by the PIMMS Management Group.
    Tyndel S; Austoker J; Henderson BJ; Brain K; Bankhead C; Clements A; Watson EK
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Sep; 25(25):3823-30. PubMed ID: 17761970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluating the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening invitation letters.
    Decker KM; Turner D; Demers AA; Martens PJ; Lambert P; Chateau D
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2013 Aug; 22(8):687-93. PubMed ID: 23915107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Do women who intermittently attend breast screening differ from those who attend every invitation and those who never attend?
    Coyle C; Kinnear H; Rosato M; Mairs A; Hall C; O'Reilly D
    J Med Screen; 2014 Jun; 21(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 24803479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Differential effects of messages for breast and cervical cancer screening.
    Jibaja-Weiss ML; Volk RJ; Smith QW; Holcomb JD; Kingery P
    J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2005 Feb; 16(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 15741708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A randomized controlled trial comparing three invitation strategies in a breast cancer screening program.
    Segura JM; Castells X; Casamitjana M; Macià F; Porta M; Katz SJ
    Prev Med; 2001 Oct; 33(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 11570837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Does mammographic screening and a negative result affect attitudes towards future breast screening?
    Drossaert CH; Boer H; Seydel ER
    J Med Screen; 2001; 8(4):204-12. PubMed ID: 11743037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An overview of the Swedish randomised mammography trials: total mortality pattern and the representivity of the study cohorts.
    Nystrom L; Larsson LG; Wall S; Rutqvist LE; Andersson I; Bjurstam N; Fagerberg G; Frisell J; Tabar L
    J Med Screen; 1996; 3(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 8849766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer.
    Eaker S; Adami HO; Granath F; Wilander E; Sparén P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 15006907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.