These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8790639)

  • 1. Application of QSARs in risk management of existing chemicals.
    Verhaar HJ; van Leeuwen CJ; Bol J; Hermens JL
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1994; 2(1-2):39-58. PubMed ID: 8790639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The application of QSARs, extrapolation and equilibrium partitioning in aquatic effects assessment for narcotic pollutants.
    Van Leeuwen CJ; Van der Zandt PT; Aldenberg T; Verhaar HJ; Hermens JL
    Sci Total Environ; 1991 Dec; 109-110():681-90. PubMed ID: 1815382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of quantitative structure--activity relationships for assessing the aquatic toxicity of phthalate esters.
    Parkerton TF; Konkel WJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2000 Jan; 45(1):61-78. PubMed ID: 10677269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations.
    Zeeman M; Auer CM; Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Boethling RS
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):179-201. PubMed ID: 8564854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The application of structure-activity relationships (SARs) in the aquatic toxicity evaluation of discrete organic chemicals.
    Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Zeeman MG; Auer CM
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):203-15. PubMed ID: 8564855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of critical body residue QSARs for predicting organic chemical toxicity to aquatic organisms.
    Barron MG; Anderson MJ; Lipton J; Dixon DG
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1997; 6(1-2):47-62. PubMed ID: 9241865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental risk assessment of hydrotropes in the United States, Europe, and Australia.
    Stanton K; Tibazarwa C; Certa H; Greggs W; Hillebold D; Jovanovich L; Woltering D; Sedlak R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jan; 6(1):155-63. PubMed ID: 19558203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aquatic effects assessment: needs and tools.
    Marchini S
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2002; 38(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 12387134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. QSAR and chemometric approaches for setting water quality objectives for dangerous chemicals.
    Vighi M; Gramatica P; Consolaro F; Todeschini R
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2001 Jul; 49(3):206-20. PubMed ID: 11440473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multispecies QSAR modeling for predicting the aquatic toxicity of diverse organic chemicals for regulatory toxicology.
    Singh KP; Gupta S; Kumar A; Mohan D
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2014 May; 27(5):741-53. PubMed ID: 24738471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chronic toxicity of copper to five benthic invertebrates in laboratory-formulated sediment: sensitivity comparison and preliminary risk assessment.
    Roman YE; De Schamphelaere KA; Nguyen LT; Janssen CR
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Nov; 387(1-3):128-40. PubMed ID: 17631947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical evaluation of chronic toxicity data on aquatic organisms for the hazard identification: the chemicals toxicity distribution approach.
    González-Doncel M; Ortiz J; Izquierdo JJ; Martín B; Sánchez P; Tarazona JV
    Chemosphere; 2006 May; 63(5):835-44. PubMed ID: 16169042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bioconcentration, bioaccumulation, and metabolism of pesticides in aquatic organisms.
    Katagi T
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010; 204():1-132. PubMed ID: 19957234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acute toxicity value extrapolation with fish and aquatic invertebrates.
    Buckler DR; Mayer FL; Ellersieck MR; Asfaw A
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 49(4):546-58. PubMed ID: 16205993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicals established in multi-species vs. single-species toxicity test systems.
    De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 18774172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approaches for derivation of environmental quality criteria for substances applied in risk assessment of discharges from offshore drilling operations.
    Altin D; Frost TK; Nilssen I
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Apr; 4(2):204-14. PubMed ID: 18232742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association between contaminant tissue residues and effects in aquatic organisms.
    Barron MG; Hansen JA; Lipton J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2002; 173():1-37. PubMed ID: 11776748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical evaluation of the sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls.
    Beckert DS; Ginn TC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Apr; 4(2):156-70. PubMed ID: 17994918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.