These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8790643)

  • 1. The electronic factor in QSAR: MO-parameters, competing interactions, reactivity and toxicity.
    Mekenyan OG; Veith GD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1994; 2(1-2):129-43. PubMed ID: 8790643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A conceptual framework for predicting the toxicity of reactive chemicals: modeling soft electrophilicity.
    Schultz TW; Carlson RE; Cronin MT; Hermens JL; Johnson R; O'Brien PJ; Roberts DW; Siraki A; Wallace KB; Veith GD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):413-28. PubMed ID: 16920662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationships between descriptors for hydrophobicity and soft electrophilicity in predicting toxicity.
    Mekenyan OG; Veith GD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1993; 1(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 8790637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: an overview.
    Bradbury SP
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1994; 2(1-2):89-104. PubMed ID: 8790641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. QSAR models for predicting the acute toxicity of selected organic chemicals with diverse structures to aquatic non-vertebrates and humans.
    Calleja MC; Geladi P; Persoone G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1994; 2(3):193-234. PubMed ID: 8790646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Tetrahymena and Pimephales toxicity based on mechanism of action.
    Bearden AP; Schultz TW
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1998; 9(3-4):127-53. PubMed ID: 9933957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Promises and pitfalls of quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches for predicting metabolism and toxicity.
    Zvinavashe E; Murk AJ; Rietjens IM
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Dec; 21(12):2229-36. PubMed ID: 19548346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of acute mammalian toxicity from QSARs and interspecies correlations.
    Devillers J; Devillers H
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009 Jul; 20(5-6):467-500. PubMed ID: 19916110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. QSAR modeling of large heterogeneous sets of molecules.
    Devillers J
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2001; 12(6):515-28. PubMed ID: 11813803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of the Hard and Soft, Acids and Bases (HSAB) theory to toxicant--target interactions.
    Lopachin RM; Gavin T; Decaprio A; Barber DS
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2012 Feb; 25(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 22053936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SAR and QSAR modeling of endocrine disruptors.
    Devillers J; Marchand-Geneste N; Carpy A; Porcher JM
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):393-412. PubMed ID: 16920661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skin sensitization: modeling based on skin metabolism simulation and formation of protein conjugates.
    Dimitrov SD; Low LK; Patlewicz GY; Kern PS; Dimitrova GD; Comber MH; Phillips RD; Niemela J; Bailey PT; Mekenyan OG
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(4):189-204. PubMed ID: 16126613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [SAR and QSAR methods in the study of dioxin action].
    Piskorska-Pliszczyńska J
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1998; 49(4):433-45. PubMed ID: 10224888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using molecular quantum similarity measures as descriptors in quantitative structure-toxicity relationships.
    Gironés X; Amat L; Carbó-Dorca R
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1999 Dec; 10(6):545-56. PubMed ID: 10674292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration of graph theory and quantum chemistry for structure-activity relationships.
    Balasubramanian K
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1994; 2(1-2):59-77. PubMed ID: 8790640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of Hasse diagrams as a potential approach for inverse QSAR.
    Brüggemann R; Pudenz S; Carlsen L; Sørensen PB; Thomsen M; Mishra RK
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2001 Feb; 11(5-6):473-87. PubMed ID: 11328715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. QSAR and mechanistic interpretation of estrogen receptor binding.
    Serafimova R; Todorov M; Nedelcheva D; Pavlov T; Akahori Y; Nakai M; Mekenyan O
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(3-4):389-421. PubMed ID: 17514577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative structure-based modeling applied to characterization and prediction of chemical toxicity.
    Benigni R; Richard AM
    Methods; 1998 Mar; 14(3):264-76. PubMed ID: 9571083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AI and SAR approaches for predicting chemical carcinogenicity: survey and status report.
    Richardt AM; Benigni R
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Mar; 13(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 12074379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.