These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8792219)

  • 1. Evaluation of computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) with IDENT stain to determine sperm concentration.
    Zinaman MJ; Uhler ML; Vertuno E; Fisher SG; Clegg ED
    J Androl; 1996; 17(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 8792219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of rat epididymal sperm counts by IVOS HTM-IDENT and hemacytometer.
    Strader LF; Linder RE; Perreault SD
    Reprod Toxicol; 1996; 10(6):529-33. PubMed ID: 8946567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS).
    Klimowicz MD; Nizanski W; Batkowski F; Savic MA
    Theriogenology; 2008 Jul; 70(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18423566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of four methods for sperm counting].
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Lu NQ; Shao Y; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Mar; 12(3):222-4, 227. PubMed ID: 16597036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a fluorescent computer-assisted spermatozoal quantification method and a comparison of results for manual counting with a haemocytometer and computer-assisted semen analysis in dogs.
    Watts J
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Nov; 54(11):1477-1488. PubMed ID: 31441976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Media and dilution procedures tested to minimize handling effects on human, rabbit, and bull sperm for computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA).
    Farrell PB; Foote RH; McArdle MM; Trouern-Trend VL; Tardif AL
    J Androl; 1996; 17(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 8792220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality evaluation of 3 sperm counting chambers by computer-assisted sperm analysis system].
    Cai J; Zeng Y; Song C; Mo ML; Yin B; Lin Q; Huang J
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19452697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A
    Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the sperm class analyser CASA system for sperm counting in a busy diagnostic semen analysis laboratory.
    Dearing CG; Kilburn S; Lindsay KS
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2014 Mar; 17(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24359435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer.
    Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 8557133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of chamber type integrated with computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) system on the results of boar semen evaluation.
    Gączarzewicz D
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2015; 18(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 26812825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motility and other characteristics of human sperm can be measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis of samples stained with Hoechst 33342.
    Farrell PB; Foote RH; Zinaman MJ
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Sep; 66(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 8751746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
    Akashi T; Mizuno I; Okumura A; Fuse H
    Arch Androl; 2005; 51(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 16214729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of membrane integrity in canine spermatozoa using a fluorescent computer-assisted spermatozoal quantification method and manual counting after eosin-nigrosin staining compared with manual counting after CFDA/PI staining.
    Watts J
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Dec; 54(12):1583-1595. PubMed ID: 31545547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Manual vs. computer-assisted sperm analysis: can CASA replace manual assessment of human semen in clinical practice?
    Talarczyk-Desole J; Berger A; Taszarek-Hauke G; Hauke J; Pawelczyk L; Jedrzejczak P
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 28326513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the semen analysis results obtained from two branded computer-aided sperm analysis systems.
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Shao Y; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Andrologia; 2013 Oct; 45(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 22928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms.
    Tomlinson MJ; Pooley K; Simpson T; Newton T; Hopkisson J; Jayaprakasan K; Jayaprakasan R; Naeem A; Pridmore T
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1911-20. PubMed ID: 19200972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is flow cytometry really adapted to the determination of sperm concentration?
    Lu JC; Chen F; Xu HR; Wu YM; Xia XY; Huang YF; Lu NQ
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 17558894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): capabilities and potential developments.
    Amann RP; Waberski D
    Theriogenology; 2014 Jan; 81(1):5-17.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24274405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of image cytometry for sperm concentration measurement: Comparison with manual counting of 4010 human semen samples.
    Egeberg Palme DL; Johannsen TH; Petersen JH; Skakkebæk NE; Juul A; Jørgensen N; Almstrup K
    Clin Chim Acta; 2017 May; 468():114-119. PubMed ID: 28242391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.