These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8792248)

  • 1. Femoral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, long-stem prosthesis.
    Malkani AL; Lewallen DG; Cabanela ME; Wallrichs SL
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Jun; 11(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 8792248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
    Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impaction allografting with cement for revision of the femoral component. A minimum four-year follow-up study with use of a precoated femoral stem.
    Leopold SS; Berger RA; Rosenberg AG; Jacobs JJ; Quigley LR; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Aug; 81(8):1080-92. PubMed ID: 10466641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Satisfactory Results of the Exeter Revision Femoral Stem Used for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Desy NM; Johnson JD; Sierra RJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):494-498. PubMed ID: 27600303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components.
    Berry DJ; Harmsen WS; Ilstrup D; Lewallen DG; Cabanela ME
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):168-77. PubMed ID: 7554627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revision total hip arthroplasty without cement: subsidence of proximally porous-coated femoral components.
    Peters CL; Rivero DP; Kull LR; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Aug; 77(8):1217-26. PubMed ID: 7642668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component.
    McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1290-6. PubMed ID: 18519323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complications with revision of the femoral component of total hip arthroplasty. Comparison between cemented and uncemented techniques.
    Morrey BF; Kavanagh BF
    J Arthroplasty; 1992 Mar; 7(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 1564469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision hip arthroplasty with an extensively 
porous-coated stem - excellent long-term 
results also in severe femoral bone stock loss.
    Thomsen PB; Jensen NJ; Kampmann J; Bæk Hansen T
    Hip Int; 2013; 23(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 23813156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survivorship of femoral revision hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis.
    Hungerford MW; Hungerford DS; Khanuja HS; Pietryak BP; Jones LC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():126-30. PubMed ID: 17079378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. A nine to fifteen-year follow-up.
    Blackley HR; Davis AM; Hutchison CR; Gross AE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Mar; 83(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 11263637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Good results with an uncemented proximally HA-coated stem in hip revision surgery: 62 hips followed for 2-13 years.
    Salemyr MF; Skoldenberg OG; Boden HG; Ahl TE; Adolphson PY
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Apr; 79(2):184-93. PubMed ID: 18484243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failure of a proximally porous-coated femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Woolson ST; Delaney TJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Nov; 10 Suppl():S22-8. PubMed ID: 8776052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Whaley AL; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 83(9):1352-7. PubMed ID: 11568198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.
    Dearborn JT; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Poldi-Čech cemented femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty after 25 years].
    Rozkydal Z; Janíček P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Aug; 77(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 21059325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision total hip arthroplasty after removal of a fractured well-fixed extensively porous-coated femoral component using a trephine.
    Amanatullah DF; Siman H; Pallante GD; Haber DB; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1192-6. PubMed ID: 26330584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Total Hip Arthroplasty With an Uncemented Tapered Femoral Component in Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age: A Minimum 20-Year Follow-Up Study.
    McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1275-1278. PubMed ID: 26781396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Abdel MP; Cottino U; Larson DR; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):873-881. PubMed ID: 28509828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.