These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8792249)

  • 1. Comparative results of a distal modular sleeve, circumferential coating, and stiffness relief using the Anatomic Porous Replacement II.
    Dorr LD; Wan Z
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Jun; 11(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8792249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Primary total hip arthroplasty with use of the modular S-ROM prosthesis. Four to seven-year clinical and radiographic results.
    Christie MJ; DeBoer DK; Trick LW; Brothers JC; Jones RE; Vise GT; Gruen TA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1707-16. PubMed ID: 10608382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of stem stiffness and bone stiffness on bone remodeling in cemented total hip replacement.
    Wan Z; Dorr LD; Woodsome T; Ranawat A; Song M
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Feb; 14(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 10065719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of diaphyseal biologic fixation on clinical results and fixation of the APR-II stem.
    Kang JS; Dorr LD; Wan Z
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Sep; 15(6):730-5. PubMed ID: 11021448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.
    Clohisy JC; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
    Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of circumferential plasma-spray porous coating on the rate of femoral osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty.
    Emerson RH; Sanders SB; Head WC; Higgins L
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Sep; 81(9):1291-8. PubMed ID: 10505525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Failure mechanisms of anatomic porous replacement I cementless total hip replacement.
    Dorr LD; Lewonowski K; Lucero M; Harris M; Wan Z
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Jan; (334):157-67. PubMed ID: 9005909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty. Eight to eleven-year results.
    Archibeck MJ; Berger RA; Jacobs JJ; Quigley LR; Gitelis S; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1666-73. PubMed ID: 11701789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of the uncemented long-term stable fixation total hip arthroplasty.
    Sharkey PF; Barrack RL; Tvedten DE
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Aug; 13(5):546-51. PubMed ID: 9726320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
    Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical results of the midstem porous-coated anatomic uncemented femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty: a five- to nine-year prospective study.
    Knight JL; Atwater RD; Guo J
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Aug; 13(5):535-45. PubMed ID: 9726319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using a porous-coated prosthesis for bone ingrowth fixation. 3 1/2-year follow-up.
    Woolson ST; Maloney WJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1992; 7 Suppl():381-8. PubMed ID: 1431920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cementless revision of total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic porous replacement revision prosthesis.
    Buoncristiani AM; Dorr LD; Johnson C; Wan Z
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jun; 12(4):403-15. PubMed ID: 9195316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Total hip arthroplasty using proximal porous coating stem with distal sleeve: mid-term outcome.
    Saito M; Takahashi KA; Fujioka M; Ueshima K; Sakao K; Inoue S; Kubo T
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2009 Apr; 17(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19398791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric titanium porous coated acetabular component without screw fixation.
    Dorr LD; Wan Z; Cohen J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jun; (351):158-68. PubMed ID: 9646758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
    Clohisy JC; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement.
    Bugbee WD; Culpepper WJ; Engh CA; Engh CA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jul; 79(7):1007-12. PubMed ID: 9234876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite coated prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.
    Yee AJ; Kreder HK; Bookman I; Davey JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Sep; (366):120-32. PubMed ID: 10627726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.