These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8792318)

  • 1. The interexaminer reliability of measuring passive cervical range of motion, revisited.
    Nilsson N; Christensen HW; Hartvigsen J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996 Jun; 19(5):302-5. PubMed ID: 8792318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring passive cervical motion: a study of reliability.
    Nilsson N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Jun; 18(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 7673795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reliability of measuring active and passive cervical range of motion: an observer-blinded and randomized repeated-measures design.
    Christensen HW; Nilsson N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Jun; 21(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 9627865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interexaminer reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for the measurement of cervical ranges of motion.
    Zachman ZJ; Traina AD; Keating JC; Bolles ST; Braun-Porter L
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1989 Jun; 12(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 2746145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of the spin-T cervical goniometer in measuring cervical range of motion in an asymptomatic Indian population.
    Agarwal S; Allison GT; Singer KP
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005 Sep; 28(7):487-92. PubMed ID: 16182022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of cervical range of motion using the OSI CA 6000 spine motion analyser on asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.
    Petersen CM; Johnson RD; Schuit D
    Man Ther; 2000 May; 5(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 10903583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normal ranges of passive cervical motion for women and men 20-60 years old.
    Nilsson N; Hartvigsen J; Christensen HW
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996 Jun; 19(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 8792319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Natural variation of cervical range of motion: a one-way repeated-measures design.
    Christensen HW; Nilsson N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 9726064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of electromagnetic tracking technology for measurement of passive cervical range of motion: a pilot study.
    Morphett AL; Crawford CM; Lee D
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 12704307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring cervical muscle tenderness: a study of reliability.
    Nilsson N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Feb; 18(2):88-90. PubMed ID: 7790788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardized initial head position in cervical range-of-motion assessment: reliability and error analysis.
    Solinger AB; Chen J; Lantz CA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Jan; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 10658872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lasting changes in passive range motion after spinal manipulation: a randomized, blind, controlled trial.
    Nilsson N; Christensen HW; Hartvigsen J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996; 19(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 8728459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and concurrent validity of the BROM II for measuring lumbar mobility.
    Breum J; Wiberg J; Bolton JE
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Oct; 18(8):497-502. PubMed ID: 8583171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical motion assessment using virtual reality.
    Sarig-Bahat H; Weiss PL; Laufer Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19404177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability of a single, digital inclinometric range of motion measurement technique in the assessment of lumbar range of motion.
    Stude DE; Goertz C; Gallinger M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Feb; 17(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 8169547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects.
    Tousignant M; Boucher N; Bourbonnais J; Gravelle T; Quesnel M; Brosseau L
    Man Ther; 2001 Nov; 6(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 11673934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an in vivo study with the ProDisc-C.
    Rabin D; Bertagnoli R; Wharton N; Pickett GE; Duggal N
    Spine J; 2009 Feb; 9(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 18619913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter- and intrarater reliability of a back range of motion instrument.
    Kachingwe AF; Phillips BJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2347-53. PubMed ID: 16344034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A reassessment of normal cervical range of motion.
    Lantz CA; Klein G; Chen J; Mannion A; Solinger AB; Dvorak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1249-57. PubMed ID: 12811267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of the assessment of lumbar range of motion and maximal isometric strength in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Roussel NA; Truijen S; De Kerf I; Lambeets D; Nijs J; Stassijns G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):788-91. PubMed ID: 18374015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.