These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8792319)

  • 1. Normal ranges of passive cervical motion for women and men 20-60 years old.
    Nilsson N; Hartvigsen J; Christensen HW
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996 Jun; 19(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 8792319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interexaminer reliability of measuring passive cervical range of motion, revisited.
    Nilsson N; Christensen HW; Hartvigsen J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996 Jun; 19(5):302-5. PubMed ID: 8792318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring passive cervical motion: a study of reliability.
    Nilsson N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Jun; 18(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 7673795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Active head and cervical range of motion: effect of age in healthy females.
    Tommasi DG; Foppiani AC; Galante D; Lovecchio N; Sforza C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):1910-6. PubMed ID: 19680100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three-dimensional investigation in healthy young adults.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Grassi G; Mossi E
    J Orthop Res; 2002 Jan; 20(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 11853078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional analysis of the cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and gender in healthy subjects.
    Lansade C; Laporte S; Thoreux P; Rousseau MA; Skalli W; Lavaste F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2900-6. PubMed ID: 20010397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the effect of age on passive range of motion of the cervical spine in healthy working-age women.
    Salo PK; Häkkinen AH; Kautiainen H; Ylinen JJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2009 Jun; 39(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 19487821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons between active vs. passive end-range assessments in subjects exhibiting cervical range of motion asymmetries.
    Wong A; Nansel DD
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992; 15(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 1573344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lasting changes in passive range motion after spinal manipulation: a randomized, blind, controlled trial.
    Nilsson N; Christensen HW; Hartvigsen J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996; 19(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 8728459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Natural variation of cervical range of motion: a one-way repeated-measures design.
    Christensen HW; Nilsson N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 9726064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gross range of motion in the cervical spine: the effects of osteopathic muscle energy technique in asymptomatic subjects.
    Burns DK; Wells MR
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2006 Mar; 106(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 16585381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of measuring active and passive cervical range of motion: an observer-blinded and randomized repeated-measures design.
    Christensen HW; Nilsson N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Jun; 21(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 9627865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A reassessment of normal cervical range of motion.
    Lantz CA; Klein G; Chen J; Mannion A; Solinger AB; Dvorak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1249-57. PubMed ID: 12811267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The range of motion of the cervical spine in children aged from 3 to 7 years - an electrogoniometric study.
    Lewandowski J; Szulc P
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2003 Nov; 62(4):459-61. PubMed ID: 14655141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Establishing reference values for cervical spine range of motion in pre-pubescent children.
    Lynch-Caris T; Majeske KD; Brelin-Fornari J; Nashi S
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2714-9. PubMed ID: 18675420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Errors in precise examiner head placement during cervical range-of-motion measurements.
    Chen J; Lantz CA; Solinger AB
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Jun; 24(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 11416822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mastication causing segmental spinal motion in common cervical orthoses.
    Chin KR; Auerbach JD; Adams SB; Sodl JF; Riew KD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 16481953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of the spin-T cervical goniometer in measuring cervical range of motion in an asymptomatic Indian population.
    Agarwal S; Allison GT; Singer KP
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005 Sep; 28(7):487-92. PubMed ID: 16182022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standardized initial head position in cervical range-of-motion assessment: reliability and error analysis.
    Solinger AB; Chen J; Lantz CA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Jan; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 10658872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of three cervical immobilization devices.
    Hostler D; Colburn D; Seitz SR
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2009; 13(2):256-60. PubMed ID: 19291567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.