642 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8792352)
1. Comparison of central venous catheter dressings in bone marrow transplant recipients.
Brandt B; DePalma J; Irwin M; Shogan J; Lucke JF
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1996 Jun; 23(5):829-36. PubMed ID: 8792352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two different time interval protocols for central venous catheter dressing in bone marrow transplant patients: results of a randomized, multicenter study. The Italian Nurse Bone Marrow Transplant Group (GITMO).
Laura R; Degl'Innocenti M; Mocali M; Alberani F; Boschi S; Giraudi A; Arnaud MT; Zucchinali R; Paris MG; Dallara R; Thaler S; Perobelli G; Parfazi S; De Lazzer T; Peron G
Haematologica; 2000 Mar; 85(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 10702816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of transparent adherent and dry sterile gauze dressings for long-term central catheters in patients undergoing bone marrow transplant.
Shivnan JC; McGuire D; Freedman S; Sharkazy E; Bosserman G; Larson E; Grouleff P
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1991; 18(8):1349-56. PubMed ID: 1762975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management.
Maki DG; Stolz SS; Wheeler S; Mermel LA
Crit Care Med; 1994 Nov; 22(11):1729-37. PubMed ID: 7956275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access.
Raad I; Davis S; Becker M; Hohn D; Houston D; Umphrey J; Bodey GP
Arch Intern Med; 1993 Aug; 153(15):1791-6. PubMed ID: 8392831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of hemodialysis central venous catheter exit-site infections.
Harwood L; Wilson B; Thompson B; Brown E; Young D
CANNT J; 2008; 18(2):26-35. PubMed ID: 18669009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Central venous catheter related infections: comparison of polyurethane film and gauze/tape dressing].
Cicolini G; di Labio L; Copetti M; Lazzari S; Bucci I
Prof Inferm; 2008; 61(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18462569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of central venous catheter type and methods on catheter-related colonization and bacteraemia.
Moretti EW; Ofstead CL; Kristy RM; Wetzler HP
J Hosp Infect; 2005 Oct; 61(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16026898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Catheter-related bloodstream infection in adult haematology patients: catheter removal practice and outcome.
Coyle VM; McMullan R; Morris TC; Rooney PJ; Hedderwick S
J Hosp Infect; 2004 Aug; 57(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 15262394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of different sterile barrier precautions and central venous catheter dressing on the skin colonization around the insertion site.
Carrer S; Bocchi A; Bortolotti M; Braga N; Gilli G; Candini M; Tartari S
Minerva Anestesiol; 2005 May; 71(5):197-206. PubMed ID: 15834348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Percutaneous placement of femoral central venous catheter in patients undergoing transplantation of bone marrow.
Lazarus HM; Creger RJ; Bloom AD; Shenk R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 May; 170(5):403-6. PubMed ID: 2183372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Central venous catheter site care for blood and marrow transplant recipients.
Zitella L
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2003; 7(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 12793335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in children with cancer.
Horvath B; Norville R; Lee D; Hyde A; Gregurich M; Hockenberry M
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2009 Mar; 36(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 19273413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections: improving post-insertion catheter care.
Shapey IM; Foster MA; Whitehouse T; Jumaa P; Bion JF
J Hosp Infect; 2009 Feb; 71(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 19013680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of two different protocols on change of medication in central venous catheterization in patients with bone marrow transplantation: results of a randomized multicenter study].
Rasero L; Degl'Innocenti M; Mocali M; Alberani F; Boschi S; Giraudi A; Arnaud MT; Zucchinali R; Paris MG; Dallara R; Thaler S; Perobelli G; Parfazi S; De Lazzer T; Peron G
Assist Inferm Ric; 2000; 19(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 11107366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of protective clothing in infection prevention in patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Duquette-Petersen L; Francis ME; Dohnalek L; Skinner R; Dudas P
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1999 Sep; 26(8):1319-24. PubMed ID: 10497771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of dressing materials on central venous catheter infection rates.
Treston-Aurand J; Olmsted RN; Allen-Bridson K; Craig CP
J Intraven Nurs; 1997; 20(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 9281961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters.
Webster J; Gillies D; O'Riordan E; Sherriff KL; Rickard CM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Nov; (11):CD003827. PubMed ID: 22071809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating central venous catheter care in a pediatric intensive care unit.
Hatler C; Buckwald L; Salas-Allison Z; Murphy-Taylor C
Am J Crit Care; 2009 Nov; 18(6):514-20; quiz 521. PubMed ID: 19880953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective cohort study of central venous catheters among internal medicine ward patients.
Trick WE; Miranda J; Evans AT; Charles-Damte M; Reilly BM; Clarke P
Am J Infect Control; 2006 Dec; 34(10):636-41. PubMed ID: 17161738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
