172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8792833)
1. Validation of the SOS/umu test using test results of 486 chemicals and comparison with the Ames test and carcinogenicity data.
Reifferscheid G; Heil J
Mutat Res; 1996 Aug; 369(3-4):129-45. PubMed ID: 8792833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Salmonella (Ames) test, umu tests, and the SOS Chromotests for detecting genotoxins.
McDaniels AE; Reyes AL; Wymer LJ; Rankin CC; Stelma GN
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1990; 16(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 2209576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the new system (umu-test) for the detection of environmental mutagens and carcinogens.
Oda Y; Nakamura S; Oki I; Kato T; Shinagawa H
Mutat Res; 1985 Oct; 147(5):219-29. PubMed ID: 3900709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Salmonella umu test with 83 NTP chemicals.
Yasunaga K; Kiyonari A; Oikawa T; Abe N; Yoshikawa K
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 44(4):329-45. PubMed ID: 15476194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Salmonella sulA-test: a new in vitro system to detect genotoxins.
el Mzibri M; De Méo MP; Laget M; Guiraud H; Séree E; Barra Y; Duménil G
Mutat Res; 1996 Aug; 369(3-4):195-208. PubMed ID: 8792838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EURL ECVAM Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity Database of Substances Eliciting Negative Results in the Ames Test: Construction of the Database.
Madia F; Kirkland D; Morita T; White P; Asturiol D; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2020; 854-855():503199. PubMed ID: 32660827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the SOS/umu-test post-treatment assay for the detection of genotoxic activities of pure compounds and complex environmental mixtures.
Hamer B; Bihari N; Reifferscheid G; Zahn RK; Müller WE; Batel R
Mutat Res; 2000 Mar; 466(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 10727903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genotoxicity assessment of suspended particulate matter in the Elbe river: comparison of Salmonella microsome test, arabinose resistance test, and umu-test.
Vahl HH; Karbe L; Westendorf J
Mutat Res; 1997 Nov; 394(1-3):81-93. PubMed ID: 9434847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The SOS Chromotest, a colorimetric bacterial assay for genotoxins: validation study with 83 compounds.
Quillardet P; de Bellecombe C; Hofnung M
Mutat Res; 1985 Jun; 147(3):79-95. PubMed ID: 3889610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a new enzyme extraction system to improve the sensitivity of SOS/umu test and application to environmental samples.
Tian Z; Oda Y; Zhang Y; Yang M; Li H
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2015 Mar; 94(3):370-5. PubMed ID: 25542254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The SOS chromotest: a review.
Quillardet P; Hofnung M
Mutat Res; 1993 Oct; 297(3):235-79. PubMed ID: 7692273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SOS-inducing activity of chemical carcinogens and mutagens in Salmonella typhimurium TA1535/pSK1002: examination with 151 chemicals.
Nakamura SI; Oda Y; Shimada T; Oki I; Sugimoto K
Mutat Res; 1987 Dec; 192(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 3317033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The VITOTOX test, an SOS bioluminescence Salmonella typhimurium test to measure genotoxicity kinetics.
van der Lelie D; Regniers L; Borremans B; Provoost A; Verschaeve L
Mutat Res; 1997 Mar; 389(2-3):279-90. PubMed ID: 9093394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of SOS umu-test for the detection of genotoxic volatile chemicals and air pollutants.
Ong TM; Stewart J; Wen YF; Whong WZ
Environ Mutagen; 1987; 9(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 2434323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increase of sensitivity and validity of the SOS/umu-test after replacement of the beta-galactosidase reporter gene with luciferase.
Schmid C; Reifferscheid G; Zahn RK; Bachmann M
Mutat Res; 1997 Nov; 394(1-3):9-16. PubMed ID: 9434838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Construction and evaluation of a cea-lacZ gene fusion for the detection of environmental mutagens and carcinogens.
Schumann W; Songür N; Miltenburger HG
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1991 Jul; 65(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 1916230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays for the rapid assessment of genotoxicity in the early research phase of drug development.
Westerink WM; Stevenson JC; Lauwers A; Griffioen G; Horbach GJ; Schoonen WG
Mutat Res; 2009 May; 676(1-2):113-30. PubMed ID: 19393335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The SOS induction of umu'-'lacZ fusion gene by oxidative damage is influenced by polyamines in Escherichia coli.
Oh TJ; Kim IG
Cell Biol Toxicol; 1999; 15(5):291-7. PubMed ID: 10813362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of different pairs of DNA repair-deficient and DNA repair-proficient bacterial tester strains for rapid detection of chemical mutagens and carcinogens.
Suter W; Jaeger I
Mutat Res; 1982 Feb; 97(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 6799822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
