These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8792833)

  • 1. Validation of the SOS/umu test using test results of 486 chemicals and comparison with the Ames test and carcinogenicity data.
    Reifferscheid G; Heil J
    Mutat Res; 1996 Aug; 369(3-4):129-45. PubMed ID: 8792833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Salmonella (Ames) test, umu tests, and the SOS Chromotests for detecting genotoxins.
    McDaniels AE; Reyes AL; Wymer LJ; Rankin CC; Stelma GN
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1990; 16(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 2209576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
    Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
    Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the new system (umu-test) for the detection of environmental mutagens and carcinogens.
    Oda Y; Nakamura S; Oki I; Kato T; Shinagawa H
    Mutat Res; 1985 Oct; 147(5):219-29. PubMed ID: 3900709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Salmonella umu test with 83 NTP chemicals.
    Yasunaga K; Kiyonari A; Oikawa T; Abe N; Yoshikawa K
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 44(4):329-45. PubMed ID: 15476194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Salmonella sulA-test: a new in vitro system to detect genotoxins.
    el Mzibri M; De Méo MP; Laget M; Guiraud H; Séree E; Barra Y; Duménil G
    Mutat Res; 1996 Aug; 369(3-4):195-208. PubMed ID: 8792838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EURL ECVAM Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity Database of Substances Eliciting Negative Results in the Ames Test: Construction of the Database.
    Madia F; Kirkland D; Morita T; White P; Asturiol D; Corvi R
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2020; 854-855():503199. PubMed ID: 32660827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the SOS/umu-test post-treatment assay for the detection of genotoxic activities of pure compounds and complex environmental mixtures.
    Hamer B; Bihari N; Reifferscheid G; Zahn RK; Müller WE; Batel R
    Mutat Res; 2000 Mar; 466(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 10727903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotoxicity assessment of suspended particulate matter in the Elbe river: comparison of Salmonella microsome test, arabinose resistance test, and umu-test.
    Vahl HH; Karbe L; Westendorf J
    Mutat Res; 1997 Nov; 394(1-3):81-93. PubMed ID: 9434847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The SOS Chromotest, a colorimetric bacterial assay for genotoxins: validation study with 83 compounds.
    Quillardet P; de Bellecombe C; Hofnung M
    Mutat Res; 1985 Jun; 147(3):79-95. PubMed ID: 3889610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of a new enzyme extraction system to improve the sensitivity of SOS/umu test and application to environmental samples.
    Tian Z; Oda Y; Zhang Y; Yang M; Li H
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2015 Mar; 94(3):370-5. PubMed ID: 25542254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The SOS chromotest: a review.
    Quillardet P; Hofnung M
    Mutat Res; 1993 Oct; 297(3):235-79. PubMed ID: 7692273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SOS-inducing activity of chemical carcinogens and mutagens in Salmonella typhimurium TA1535/pSK1002: examination with 151 chemicals.
    Nakamura SI; Oda Y; Shimada T; Oki I; Sugimoto K
    Mutat Res; 1987 Dec; 192(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 3317033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The VITOTOX test, an SOS bioluminescence Salmonella typhimurium test to measure genotoxicity kinetics.
    van der Lelie D; Regniers L; Borremans B; Provoost A; Verschaeve L
    Mutat Res; 1997 Mar; 389(2-3):279-90. PubMed ID: 9093394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of SOS umu-test for the detection of genotoxic volatile chemicals and air pollutants.
    Ong TM; Stewart J; Wen YF; Whong WZ
    Environ Mutagen; 1987; 9(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 2434323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increase of sensitivity and validity of the SOS/umu-test after replacement of the beta-galactosidase reporter gene with luciferase.
    Schmid C; Reifferscheid G; Zahn RK; Bachmann M
    Mutat Res; 1997 Nov; 394(1-3):9-16. PubMed ID: 9434838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Construction and evaluation of a cea-lacZ gene fusion for the detection of environmental mutagens and carcinogens.
    Schumann W; Songür N; Miltenburger HG
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1991 Jul; 65(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 1916230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays for the rapid assessment of genotoxicity in the early research phase of drug development.
    Westerink WM; Stevenson JC; Lauwers A; Griffioen G; Horbach GJ; Schoonen WG
    Mutat Res; 2009 May; 676(1-2):113-30. PubMed ID: 19393335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The SOS induction of umu'-'lacZ fusion gene by oxidative damage is influenced by polyamines in Escherichia coli.
    Oh TJ; Kim IG
    Cell Biol Toxicol; 1999; 15(5):291-7. PubMed ID: 10813362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of different pairs of DNA repair-deficient and DNA repair-proficient bacterial tester strains for rapid detection of chemical mutagens and carcinogens.
    Suter W; Jaeger I
    Mutat Res; 1982 Feb; 97(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 6799822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.