201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8793122)
1. Precision of dipole localization in a spherical volume conductor: a comparison of referential EEG, magnetoencephalography and scalp current density methods.
Murro AM; Smith JR; King DW; Park YD
Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 8793122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial relationship of source localizations in patients with focal epilepsy: Comparison of MEG and EEG with a three spherical shells and a boundary element volume conductor model.
Scheler G; Fischer MJ; Genow A; Hummel C; Rampp S; Paulini A; Hopfengärtner R; Kaltenhäuser M; Stefan H
Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Apr; 28(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 16933294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Localization of deep brain activity with scalp and subdural EEG.
Fahimi Hnazaee M; Wittevrongel B; Khachatryan E; Libert A; Carrette E; Dauwe I; Meurs A; Boon P; Van Roost D; Van Hulle MM
Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117344. PubMed ID: 32898677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MEG and EEG in epilepsy.
Barkley GL; Baumgartner C
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 20(3):163-78. PubMed ID: 12881663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MEG and EEG topography of frontal midline theta rhythm and source localization.
Iramina K; Ueno S; Matsuoka S
Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 8728427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EEG source localization.
Michel CM; He B
Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():85-101. PubMed ID: 31277878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of scalp 10-20 EEG and magnetoencephalography.
Kakisaka Y; Alkawadri R; Wang ZI; Enatsu R; Mosher JC; Dubarry AS; Alexopoulos AV; Burgess RC
Epileptic Disord; 2013 Mar; 15(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 23531601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dipole source analysis for readiness potential and field using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1362-5. PubMed ID: 24109949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain.
Cohen D; Cuffin BN; Yunokuchi K; Maniewski R; Purcell C; Cosgrove GR; Ives J; Kennedy JG; Schomer DL
Ann Neurol; 1990 Dec; 28(6):811-7. PubMed ID: 2285267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On-scalp MEG sensor localization using magnetic dipole-like coils: A method for highly accurate co-registration.
Pfeiffer C; Ruffieux S; Andersen LM; Kalabukhov A; Winkler D; Oostenveld R; Lundqvist D; Schneiderman JF
Neuroimage; 2020 May; 212():116686. PubMed ID: 32119981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefit of simultaneous recording of EEG and MEG in dipole localization.
Yoshinaga H; Nakahori T; Ohtsuka Y; Oka E; Kitamura Y; Kiriyama H; Kinugasa K; Miyamoto K; Hoshida T
Epilepsia; 2002 Aug; 43(8):924-8. PubMed ID: 12181013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information.
Baillet S; Garnero L; Marin G; Hugonin JP
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 May; 46(5):522-34. PubMed ID: 10230131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On noninvasive source imaging of the human K-complex.
Wennberg R; Cheyne D
Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 May; 124(5):941-55. PubMed ID: 23200316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MEG and EEG dipole clusters from extended cortical sources.
Fuchs M; Kastner J; Tech R; Wagner M; Gasca F
Biomed Eng Lett; 2017 Aug; 7(3):185-191. PubMed ID: 30603165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
