205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8793122)
21. Ictal magnetoencephalography in temporal and extratemporal lobe epilepsy.
Assaf BA; Karkar KM; Laxer KD; Garcia PA; Austin EJ; Barbaro NM; Aminoff MJ
Epilepsia; 2003 Oct; 44(10):1320-7. PubMed ID: 14510826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. High-resolution EEG source localization in personalized segmentation-free head model with multi-dipole fitting.
Hirata A; Niitsu M; Phang CR; Kodera S; Kida T; Rashed EA; Fukunaga M; Sadato N; Wasaka T
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(5):. PubMed ID: 38306964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Combining MEG and EEG source modeling in epilepsy evaluations.
Ebersole JS; Ebersole SM
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 27(6):360-71. PubMed ID: 21076318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.
Cohen D; Cuffin BN
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 56(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 6190632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Confidence limits of dipole source reconstruction results.
Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1442-51. PubMed ID: 15134713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Magnetoencephalographic yield of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy. Comparison with scalp EEG recordings.
Lin YY; Shih YH; Hsieh JC; Yu HY; Yiu CH; Wong TT; Yeh TC; Kwan SY; Ho LT; Yen DJ; Wu ZA; Chang MS
Neuroimage; 2003 Jul; 19(3):1115-26. PubMed ID: 12880837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Magnetoencephalography signals are influenced by skull defects.
Lau S; Flemming L; Haueisen J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Aug; 125(8):1653-62. PubMed ID: 24418220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Focal magnetoencephalographic spikes in the superior temporal plane undetected by scalp EEG.
Iwasaki M; Nakasato N; Shamoto H; Yoshimoto T
J Clin Neurosci; 2003 Mar; 10(2):236-8. PubMed ID: 12637058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Confidence interval of single dipole locations based on EEG data.
Braun C; Kaiser S; Kincses WE; Elbert T
Brain Topogr; 1997; 10(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 9358952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. MEG versus EEG: influence of background activity on interictal spike detection.
Ramantani G; Boor R; Paetau R; Ille N; Feneberg R; Rupp A; Boppel T; Scherg M; Rating D; Bast T
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Dec; 23(6):498-508. PubMed ID: 17143138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment.
Cohen D; Cuffin BN
Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 1793693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High-resolution source imaging in mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy: a comparison between MEG and simultaneous EEG.
Leijten FS; Huiskamp GJ; Hilgersom I; Van Huffelen AC
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 20(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 14530735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of EEG dipole source localization using implanted sources in the human brain.
Krings T; Chiappa KH; Cuffin BN; Cochius JI; Connolly S; Cosgrove GR
Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Jan; 110(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 10348329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of a new MEG-EEG spatio-temporal localization approach using a realistic source model.
Schwartz DP; Badier JM; Bihoué P; Bouliou A
Brain Topogr; 1999; 11(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10449259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: a simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors.
Babiloni F; Babiloni C; Carducci F; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Angelone LM; Cincotti F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 May; 22(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 15083526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interpreting abnormality: an EEG and MEG study of P50 and the auditory paired-stimulus paradigm.
Edgar JC; Huang MX; Weisend MP; Sherwood A; Miller GA; Adler LE; Cañive JM
Biol Psychol; 2003 Dec; 65(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 14638286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
