BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8793324)

  • 1. Estimating the removal and biodegradation potential of radiolabeled organic chemicals in activated sludge.
    Shimp RJ; Larson RJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1996 Jun; 34(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 8793324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of an inactivation procedure for determining the sorption of organic compounds to activated sludge.
    Kerr KM; Larson RJ; McAvoy DC
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2000 Nov; 47(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 11139186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fate of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) in activated sludge plants.
    Temmink H; Klapwijk B
    Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(4):903-12. PubMed ID: 14769410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fate and effects of triclosan in activated sludge.
    Federle TW; Kaiser SK; Nuck BA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Jul; 21(7):1330-7. PubMed ID: 12109731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
    González S; Petrovic M; Barceló D
    Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fate of lindane in the conventional activated sludge treatment process.
    Kipopoulou AM; Zouboulis A; Samara C; Kouimtzis T
    Chemosphere; 2004 Apr; 55(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 14720550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sorption and degradation of bisphenol A by aerobic activated sludge.
    Zhao J; Li Y; Zhang C; Zeng Q; Zhou Q
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jun; 155(1-2):305-11. PubMed ID: 18179868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) regulation of nutrient removal in activated sludge wastewater treatment plants.
    Li B; Bishop P
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(1-2):35-8. PubMed ID: 12216649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The partitioning of alkylphenolic surfactants and polybrominated diphenyl ether flame retardants in activated sludge batch tests.
    Langford KH; Scrimshaw MD; Birkett JW; Lester JN
    Chemosphere; 2005 Dec; 61(9):1221-30. PubMed ID: 15950259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
    Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method to study biodegradation kinetics of organic trace pollutants by activated sludge.
    Temmink H; Klapwijk B
    Chemosphere; 2003 Jul; 52(1):221-9. PubMed ID: 12729705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removal of selected endocrine disrupters in activated sludge systems: effect of sludge retention time on their sorption and biodegradation.
    Stasinakis AS; Kordoutis CI; Tsiouma VC; Gatidou G; Thomaidis NS
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Apr; 101(7):2090-5. PubMed ID: 19939674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental fate assessment of two synthetic polycarboxylate polymers.
    Jop KM; Guiney PD; Christensen KP; Silberhorn EM
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1997 Aug; 37(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 9378089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the OECD 314B activated sludge die-away test for assessing the biodegradation of pharmaceuticals.
    Ericson JF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):375-81. PubMed ID: 19961217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of anionic and nonionic surfactants on the kinetics of the aerobic heterotrophic biodegradation of organic matter in industrial wastewater.
    Liwarska-Bizukojc E; Scheumann R; Drews A; Bracklow U; Kraume M
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):923-30. PubMed ID: 17931681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biodegradation of the endogenous residue of activated sludge.
    Ramdani A; Dold P; Déléris S; Lamarre D; Gadbois A; Comeau Y
    Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2179-88. PubMed ID: 20074768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of the fate of alcohol ethoxylate homologues in a laboratory continuous activated-sludge unit study.
    Wind T; Stephenson RJ; Eadsforth CV; Sherren A; Toy R
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2006 May; 64(1):42-60. PubMed ID: 16005515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors.
    De Wever H; Van Roy S; Dotremont C; Miller J; Knepper T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sorption and biodegradation of sulfonamide antibiotics by activated sludge: experimental assessment using batch data obtained under aerobic conditions.
    Yang SF; Lin CF; Lin AY; Hong PK
    Water Res; 2011 May; 45(11):3389-97. PubMed ID: 21529876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.