138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 879356)
1. Federal constraints: earned or unearned?
Chalkley DT
Am J Psychiatry; 1977 Aug; 134(8):911-3. PubMed ID: 879356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled.
Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects.
Owens JF
Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice.
Delgado R; Leskovac H
UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):67-130. PubMed ID: 11659049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Limited guardianship: additional protection for mentally disabled research subjects used in biomedical and behavioral research.
Schaefer GF
Forum; 1981; 16(4):796-824. PubMed ID: 11651838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners.
Herch F; Flower R
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Changing federal regulation of IRBs, Part III: social research and the proposed DHEW regulations.
Gray BH
IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-5+. PubMed ID: 11661793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
Ratnoff MF
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The law and ethics of psychosocial research on AIDS.
Gray JN; Melton GB
Neb Law Rev; 1985; 64(4):637-88. PubMed ID: 11649807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychosurgery: the law's response.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 54(2):249-67. PubMed ID: 11661084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bill of rights for research subjects.
Prentice ED; Reitemeier PJ; Antonson DL; Kelso TK; Jameton A
IRB; 1993; 15(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of IRBs on political science research.
Cleary RE
IRB; 1987; 9(3):6-10. PubMed ID: 11652494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal experimentation: moral, legal, and medical implications.
Reback GL
Stanford Law Rev; 1974 May; 26(5):1191-207. PubMed ID: 11663472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Using the brain dead for medical research.
Martyn SR
Utah Law Rev; 1986; 1986(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 11651917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How to interpret the federal policy for the protection of human subjects or "Common Rule" (Part A). [for the Working Group of the Human Subjects Research Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Council].
Shelton JD
IRB; 1999; 21(6):6-9. PubMed ID: 11697393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Balancing moral principles in federal regulations on human research.
Ackerman TF
IRB; 1992; 14(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Protecting human subjects of research: an analysis of proposed amendments to HEW policy.
de Sola Pool I
PS (Wash DC); 1979; 12(4):452-5. PubMed ID: 11649394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
